Register to reply 
Black hole why wouldn't this work 
Share this thread: 
#1
Apr1712, 11:22 PM

P: 4

I read that there is no way to escape a black hole once you enter the noescapeboundary, no matter what you do.
Your ship travels directly towards the center point of the black hole so that it doesn't orbit it. After it passes the noescapeboundary, you thrust in the opposite direction with a slightly greater force than the gravity pulling it in. So you slowly move from the black hole's center and escape the black hole. Why wouldn't this work??? 


#2
Apr1712, 11:29 PM

P: 433

Because it would require an infinite amount of acceleration. Photons can not even escape the black hole  as they approach the event horizon they slow down and simply hover near it, never actually passing it. If a photon can't escape, nothing with mass has any chance to.



#3
Apr1712, 11:41 PM

P: 4

I could see if the ship were orbiting the black hole. But what if it were traveling towards it like a 1dimensional line. The force pulling you in is finite, if you push back with a slightly greater force you should still get sucked in?



#4
Apr1812, 12:05 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 2,470

Black hole why wouldn't this work



#5
Apr1812, 03:38 AM

P: 7

This bugs me also. I keep envisioning an Earth with a hole running through it. After falling in, I continue to fall until I reach groundlevel on the opposite side. At this point, all of my kinetic energy has been converted to potential energy again before falling back into the Earth. If at any time during my fall, I were to hit my jet pack accelerator, I would be able to get much higher than just groundlevel.
Now, crank up the density of the planet until groundlevel becomes an event horizon. My potential energy while standing on the surface has increased dramatically, but so will the amount of kinetic energy gained from my fall. I can only suspect that falling beyond the event horizon would want to accelerate the object beyond the speed of light, which is impossible. Instead, energy is transferred to the object by a different means than kinetic energy, such as mass. Now that the object has increased mass at the expense of original potential energy, it no longer has enough kinetic energy to reach the event horizon, and will remain trapped. So, yeah.. it bugs me that I should know better. 


#6
Apr1812, 07:55 AM

Mentor
P: 11,631

There are nice coordinates where this problem can be shown.
If you happen to be at the event horizon, it appears to you that this is moving away from you with the speed of light (lines in a 45°angle are "moving" with the speed of light) and that the singularity moves towards you even faster than the speed of light. Note that the event horizon and the singularity does not actually move around  it is more like "the space moves towards it". And you are limited to the speed of light relative to this moving space. Once you are inside, there is no way out. Every direction of movement is towards the singularity. 


#7
Apr1812, 08:43 AM

PF Gold
P: 6,129




#8
Apr1812, 08:51 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 5,027




#9
Apr1812, 09:43 AM

P: 433

So I guess what I said was misleading, which is my fault, but the point I was making that even in the best possible scenario photons can't escape, so no spaceship could either. 


#10
Apr1812, 10:41 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 5,027

Is light emitted at the event horizon the same a light emitted inside the event horizon? There is no exception to my statement in the black hole region of SC geometry. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Relativistic mass increase appearing to form a black hole vs. a real black hole  Special & General Relativity  9  
Time dilation and blackholeblackhole mergers, and ringdown gravitational waves  Special & General Relativity  13  
Is it possible to escape a black hole's event horizon in a binary black hole system  Astronomy & Astrophysics  6  
How does a Black Hole work?  Astronomy & Astrophysics  8 