Mass difference between K0 and K0bar and other mesonantimeson pairsby MarekS Tags: antiparticle, conjugation, mesons decay 

#1
Nov1812, 09:56 AM

P: 34

The K0K0bar, D0D0bar, B0B0bar, Bs0Bs0bar systems all exhibit oscillations whose rate is proportional to their mass difference via a second order weak interaction "box" diagram.
I don't understand how their masses can differ, when they are simply C conjugates of one another. Doesn't the TCP theorem forbid a difference between the masses of a particle and respective antiparticle? I assume the mass difference between a K0 and a K0bar (or in the other systems) is caused not by a difference in the masses of s and sbar or d and dbar, but by something else. Can someone explain how this mass difference comes about? 



#2
Nov1812, 10:06 AM

Mentor
P: 10,840

The mass differences are not between D0 and D0bar (for example)  those are not mass eigenstates anyway. I'll keep the charm meson as example, it is similar for the other systems:
D0 and D0bar are flavour eigenstates  they have a welldefined quark content. However, they can mix into each other. This allows to find mass eigenstates D_{1}, D_{2}. Those have different masses M_{1}, M_{2} and lifetimes ##\Gamma_1##,##\Gamma_2##. The flavour eigenstates are now superpositions of those mass eigenstates and vice versa: ##D_1=p D^0 + q \overline{D^0}## and ##D_2=p D^0  q \overline{D^0}## where ##p^2+q^2=1##, both are complex parameters. Without CP violation, those mass eigenstates are CP eigenstates, and p=q. In the charm system, it is common to define ##x=\frac{M_1M_2}{\Gamma}## and ##y=\frac{\Gamma_1\Gamma_2}{2\Gamma}## where ##\Gamma=\frac{\Gamma_1+\Gamma_2}{2}## is the average lifetime. There was a recent measurement of those values by LHCb: Observation of D0D0bar oscillations I think you can find references to the theory there. 



#3
Nov1812, 10:15 AM

P: 34





#4
Nov1812, 10:15 AM

P: 82

Mass difference between K0 and K0bar and other mesonantimeson pairs
[itex]K^{0}[/itex] and [itex]\bar{K^{0}}[/itex] (and other examples you gave) are not mass eigenstates.
The mass difference which determines the rate of oscillations in these systems is the mass difference between the two mass eigenstates of the system. If you would write the mass matrix in the [itex]K^{0}[/itex], [itex]\bar{K^{0}}[/itex] basis you would get that the diagonal terms are equal ( due to CPT, as you said) but the off diagonal term (due to [itex]K^{0}\leftrightarrow\bar{K^{0}}[/itex] oscillations) would cause splitting in mass between the mass eigenstates. The mass eigenstates are not conjugates of eachother. 



#5
Nov1812, 11:00 AM

Mentor
P: 10,840

$$M=\begin{pmatrix} M_{11} & M_{12} \\ M_{21} & M_{22} \end{pmatrix}$$
+CPT => ##M_{11}=M_{22}## +CP => ##M_{12}=M_{21}## The mass matrix has two different eigenvalues, their difference depends on the relative strength of M_{12} to M_{11}. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
difference between the 2 bases pairs  Biology  9  
meson mass predictions  Advanced Physics Homework  4  
Conjecture for prime pairs of difference two  Linear & Abstract Algebra  6  
Mass conservation in meson theory  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  4  
How many is the effective mass of the d quark in the K0 meson?  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  0 