Register to reply

Mass difference between K0 and K0-bar and other meson-antimeson pairs

Share this thread:
MarekS
#1
Nov18-12, 09:56 AM
P: 34
The K0--K0-bar, D0--D0-bar, B0--B0-bar, Bs0--Bs0-bar systems all exhibit oscillations whose rate is proportional to their mass difference via a second order weak interaction "box" diagram.

I don't understand how their masses can differ, when they are simply C conjugates of one another. Doesn't the TCP theorem forbid a difference between the masses of a particle and respective anti-particle?

I assume the mass difference between a K0 and a K0-bar (or in the other systems) is caused not by a difference in the masses of s and s-bar or d and d-bar, but by something else. Can someone explain how this mass difference comes about?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists discuss quantum pigeonhole principle
First in-situ images of void collapse in explosives
The first supercomputer simulations of 'spin?orbit' forces between neutrons and protons in an atomic nucleus
mfb
#2
Nov18-12, 10:06 AM
Mentor
P: 11,589
The mass differences are not between D0 and D0bar (for example) - those are not mass eigenstates anyway. I'll keep the charm meson as example, it is similar for the other systems:

D0 and D0bar are flavour eigenstates - they have a well-defined quark content.
However, they can mix into each other. This allows to find mass eigenstates D1, D2. Those have different masses M1, M2 and lifetimes ##\Gamma_1##,##\Gamma_2##.
The flavour eigenstates are now superpositions of those mass eigenstates and vice versa:

##D_1=p D^0 + q \overline{D^0}## and ##D_2=p D^0 - q \overline{D^0}##
where ##|p|^2+|q|^2=1##, both are complex parameters.

Without CP violation, those mass eigenstates are CP eigenstates, and p=q.

In the charm system, it is common to define
##x=\frac{M_1-M_2}{\Gamma}## and ##y=\frac{\Gamma_1-\Gamma_2}{2\Gamma}## where ##\Gamma=\frac{\Gamma_1+\Gamma_2}{2}## is the average lifetime.
There was a recent measurement of those values by LHCb: Observation of D0-D0bar oscillations
I think you can find references to the theory there.
MarekS
#3
Nov18-12, 10:15 AM
P: 34
Quote Quote by mfb View Post
The mass differences are not between D0 and D0bar (for example) - those are not mass eigenstates anyway. I'll keep the charm meson as example, it is similar for the other systems:

D0 and D0bar are flavour eigenstates - they have a well-defined quark content.
However, they can mix into each other. This allows to find mass eigenstates D1, D2. Those have different masses M1, M2 and lifetimes ##\Gamma_1##,##\Gamma_2##.
The flavour eigenstates are now superpositions of those mass eigenstates and vice versa:

##D_1=p D^0 + q \overline{D^0}## and ##D_2=p D^0 - q \overline{D^0}##
where ##|p|^2+|q|^2=1##, both are complex parameters.

Without CP violation, those mass eigenstates are CP eigenstates, and p=q.

In the charm system, it is common to define
##x=\frac{M_1-M_2}{\Gamma}## and ##y=\frac{\Gamma_1-\Gamma_2}{2\Gamma}## where ##\Gamma=\frac{\Gamma_1+\Gamma_2}{2}## is the average lifetime.
There was a recent measurement of those values by LHCb: Observation of D0-D0bar oscillations
I think you can find references to the theory there.
Thanks! What you say makes sense to me. Except that the question why then is there a mass difference between D1 and D2 remains. ##D^0## and ##\overline{D^0}## have the same mass and p, q are normalised. What is causing the difference in the mass of the mass eigenstates?

ofirg
#4
Nov18-12, 10:15 AM
P: 90
Mass difference between K0 and K0-bar and other meson-antimeson pairs

[itex]K^{0}[/itex] and [itex]\bar{K^{0}}[/itex] (and other examples you gave) are not mass eigenstates.

The mass difference which determines the rate of oscillations in these systems is the mass difference between the two mass eigenstates of the system.

If you would write the mass matrix in the [itex]K^{0}[/itex], [itex]\bar{K^{0}}[/itex] basis you would get that the diagonal terms are equal ( due to CPT, as you said) but the off diagonal term (due to [itex]K^{0}\leftrightarrow\bar{K^{0}}[/itex] oscillations) would cause splitting in mass between the mass eigenstates.

The mass eigenstates are not conjugates of eachother.
mfb
#5
Nov18-12, 11:00 AM
Mentor
P: 11,589
$$M=\begin{pmatrix} M_{11} & M_{12} \\ M_{21} & M_{22} \end{pmatrix}$$
+CPT => ##M_{11}=M_{22}##
+CP => ##M_{12}=M_{21}##

The mass matrix has two different eigenvalues, their difference depends on the relative strength of M12 to M11.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Difference between the 2 bases pairs Biology 9
Meson mass predictions Advanced Physics Homework 4
Conjecture for prime pairs of difference two Linear & Abstract Algebra 6
Mass conservation in meson theory High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 4
How many is the effective mass of the d quark in the K0 meson? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 0