New Reply

conflict in AC electricity

 
Share Thread
Jan29-13, 07:35 AM   #18
 

conflict in AC electricity


Quote by mickybob View Post
The debate has got a bit side-tracked, so lets go back to the 'physics' of your question which I'm sure we'll all agree on. Firstly - please re-read my first post - I think you have some basic misunderstandings.

'Dangerous' means current flowing through you, not through a wire.

You are standing on the ground, then to a reasonable approximation you are grounded, i.e. at what we usually call 0 V. This will be a better approximation if you stand in a pool of water.

The live wire is at, for example, 240 V relative to ground.

The neutral wire is at (give or take) 0 V relative to ground.

If you touch the live wire, there will be a 240 V potential difference between your hand and your feet and hence ground. Your resistance is not that high, so a big current will flow and you'll probably die.

If you touch the neutral wire, there will be (in principle) a 0 V potential difference between your hand and your feet - nothing will happen.

There is a voltage drop of 240 V across the 'load' - this can be your TV or, if nothing is plugged in, air.

If it's your TV, then there is a relatively low resistance, and so there is a current running through the live wire, across the load, through the neutral wire and back into the supply. If the 'load' is air (nothing is plugged in) then the resistance is huge and the current running along this path is essentially zero.

Either way, it doesn't matter - only a current running through you is dangerous and that depends on the voltage drop across you (and your resistance).

Having said all that, in practice things might be slightly more complicated, and I wouldn't suggest you still metal objects in the neutral plug.
That's a good explanation. But why is there a separate ground and neutral wire then in some cases?
Jan29-13, 07:36 AM   #19
 
Quote by russ_watters View Post
I know it is tied to ground, but it doesn't have to be for this to be true.

Neutral and ground are tied together to ensure exactly zero potential between them, but even if they weren't, there would still be close to zero because the load is in between the neutral and the voltage source.
0V is an arbitrary concept, its only has meaning if things are tied to ground.

Otherwise I could say the voltage of the live is 10000 V and the voltage of the neutral is 99760 V, giving a p.d. of 240 V. That is possible if it was a floating power supply.
Jan29-13, 07:45 AM   #20
 
Quote by rollingstein View Post
That's a good explanation. But why is there a separate ground and neutral wire then in some cases?
The earth is often connected to the chassis of the device.

If you did this with the neutral, it would - all else being equal - be okay.

But now suppose there was a break in the neutral wire between the plug and the power supply.

The neutral wire would jump up to 240 V and you've now got a live chassis.

Not good!

There are other reasons as well, to do with the way circuit breakers are set up to detect faults.
Jan29-13, 07:55 AM   #21
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by klmnopq View Post
is it mean eath carry current for return !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! in case of who say return is grounded

how current return into supply!!!
What are you referring to? A three phase system?
Jan29-13, 07:57 AM   #22
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by russ_watters View Post
I know it is tied to ground, but it doesn't have to be for this to be true.

Neutral and ground are tied together to ensure exactly zero potential between them, but even if they weren't, there would still be close to zero because the load is in between the neutral and the voltage source.
You refer to the US system, here?
Jan29-13, 07:58 AM   #23
 
I see you expert folks are carefully ignoring the questions to your theories in my post#13.

In particular what is the potential of the neutral terminal of a portable generator with respect to earth?

Finally would someone post the section of the Wiring Regulations that apparantly requires UK neutrals to be earthed?

I have previously posted at PF the Wiring Regulations section that prohibits this.
Jan29-13, 08:25 AM   #24
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
There's much more 'chat' than actual figures on this when I do a Google search (Dozens of forums for electrical installers etc.- anecdotes, mainly). I did find out that temporary generator installations can get away with 25V N-E but the max one should expect in a permanent installation is only 3 or 4V. This is just due to a realistic value for the neutral cable (all the way from the transformer) and a typical maximum load.
@Studiot
Your measured value of 30V would give me some concern. Where do you measure this - on the input to your consumer distribution unit or on a socket. Also, with what sort of load? If you get that with no domestic load then you should ring your supplier and they should send someone out to see you, I reckon.
(Keep your wellie boots on when you're in the shower!)

Why isn't this thread in the EE section, I wonder?
Jan29-13, 08:30 AM   #25
 
Quote by Studiot View Post
I see you expert folks are carefully ignoring the questions to your theories in my post#13.

In particular what is the potential of the neutral terminal of a portable generator with respect to earth?
If it's a floating system, it can be anything, see page 20 of:

http://www.ussu.co.uk/ClubsSocieties...430%202011.pdf

It's entirely irrelevant as everyone else is discussing mains supplies.


Finally would someone post the section of the Wiring Regulations that apparantly requires UK neutrals to be earthed?

I have previously posted at PF the Wiring Regulations section that prohibits this.
I believe that, in the UK, the neutral connection is at the transformer, not in people's housing. Since you definitely only want one connection, I would imagine that the wiring regulations would indeed say not to connect them in the house.

In the US I think the connection is in the house, which is why the discussion was getting confused.

But this is all irrelevant to the original post.

The 30 V between your neutral and earth could be due to a whole host of reasons - the most obvious being impedance of the wires. Seems strangely high to me, but I'm not a sparky.
Jan29-13, 08:37 AM   #26
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
@Studiot
You're in for a major re-wire of your house, I expect. No time for more postings on PF. You'll be out earning overtime to pay for it all.

Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise.
Jan29-13, 09:28 AM   #27
 
I have the Board's certificate of satisfactory test for my own wiring, thank you for your concern.

Any competent electrician would know that the 30 volts would not be maintained if I tried to draw significant current to earth.

I am far more concerned with the hazardous practices suggested by others here, or by the suggestion that portable generators are somehow different or are not covered by the wiring regulations. Of course they are. Much of the world's supplies are from such generators. Portable includes multi megawatt devices towed behind an HGV tractor.

Reading th OP's posts I suspect he is from 'the subcontinent' where the wiring system is based on older British practice - that of providing both earthed and non earthed AC supplies.

I repeat my comment to him that the earth should not carry current in normal operation - it is a safety conductor.

No one has offered a reason for earthing the neutral. So here is why the americans do and we do not.

Here is the reason for american practice

The consumer neutral is the centre point of a split phase transformer. By itself, it is floating. It is earthed to provide a stable reference for both phases whose differential return currents would otherwise unbalance it.
In the US the consumer's neutral does not carry any other consumer's return current.

Excellent sound practice.

But wholly inapplicable to British practice since the British consumers neutral does not stem from a consumers transformer, but from a local substation where the combined return current from the entire phase arrives. This phase services many consumers.
Jan29-13, 09:40 AM   #28
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Single transformer for many customers: the cheapest option in dense housing.
Jan29-13, 10:53 AM   #29
 
Quote by Studiot View Post
I have the Board's certificate of satisfactory test for my own wiring, thank you for your concern.

Any competent electrician would know that the 30 volts would not be maintained if I tried to draw significant current to earth.

I am far more concerned with the hazardous practices suggested by others here, or by the suggestion that portable generators are somehow different or are not covered by the wiring regulations. Of course they are. Much of the world's supplies are from such generators. Portable includes multi megawatt devices towed behind an HGV tractor.

Reading th OP's posts I suspect he is from 'the subcontinent' where the wiring system is based on older British practice - that of providing both earthed and non earthed AC supplies.

I repeat my comment to him that the earth should not carry current in normal operation - it is a safety conductor.

No one has offered a reason for earthing the neutral. So here is why the americans do and we do not.

Here is the reason for american practice

The consumer neutral is the centre point of a split phase transformer. By itself, it is floating. It is earthed to provide a stable reference for both phases whose differential return currents would otherwise unbalance it.
In the US the consumer's neutral does not carry any other consumer's return current.

Excellent sound practice.

But wholly inapplicable to British practice since the British consumers neutral does not stem from a consumers transformer, but from a local substation where the combined return current from the entire phase arrives. This phase services many consumers.
So what? The neutral is earthed at the substation instead in the UK. For the OPs question this makes no difference, the point is that neutral ~ OV.
Jan29-13, 11:00 AM   #30
 
So what? The neutral is earthed at the substation instead in the UK. For the OPs question this makes no difference, the point is that neutral ~ OV.
Do you really not understand the significance of the difference?
Jan29-13, 02:12 PM   #31
 
Mentor
Quote by Studiot View Post
Do you really not understand the significance of the difference?
I don't. Please explain.

If the neutral and ground are tied together at the substation, the neutral will have approximately zero potential art the ground, everywhere. As it pertains to the OP's question, I don't see why it matters where they are connected, only that they are.
Jan29-13, 02:52 PM   #32
 
I don't. Please explain.
Good evening Russ.

First who said the neutral and ground are tied together at the substation?
I didn't.

In the US, a pair of transmission wires, single phase no earth (the company feed) are brought to the company side of the consumer supply transformer (actually owned by the company I believe but I'm not sure about that). That is the primary.

The consumer is supplied from a centre tapped secondary on this transformer. The centre tap is earthed locally. The two halves of the 'split phase' are used to supply the consumer 120 outlets and the whole secondary used to supply any 240 heavy demand installations.
As far as possible the split phases are balanced but in any event their current draw does not affect the current through the primary circuit terminals, only its magnitude.

The other point of this is that the consumer is electrically isolated from other consumers and cannot unbalance their supplies, since the consumer is in the secondary and the feed supply in the primary.

In British practice, on the other hand, imagine the effect of multiple grounding one of the two main conductors of a phase. All the phase current would be routed directly to local ground, leaving serious unbalance in the (neutral) return conductor.

The British consumer is not electrically isolated from his neighbour and what he does affects the neighbours supply.
Jan29-13, 02:57 PM   #33
 
Mentor
That's all fine, but what does that have to do with the OP's question? To be more precise: if you stand in a bathtub full of water and grab a neutral wire in London, should you expect a shock?
Jan29-13, 03:06 PM   #34
 
That's all fine, but what does that have to do with the OP's question? To be more precise: if you stand in a bathtub full of water and grab a neutral wire in London, should you expect a shock?
I already answered that in my first post

mickybob is on the right lines, the actual current flowing in the wires does not present the danger. It is the voltage difference between yourself and something else.
The power company maintains the neutral at somewhere near earth potential (mine is often about 30 volts) and the phase at line voltage above that. It is this potential difference the delivers the electrical power to your appliances.

You are also at approximately earth voltage so if you touch the neutral of the supply wire you are probably safe, but don't try it to see.
New Reply

Similar discussions for: conflict in AC electricity
Thread Forum Replies
What is a context conflict? Calculus & Beyond Homework 12
QM conflict with relativity Quantum Physics 2
Resolving conflict Current Events 0
GR and QM conflict Special & General Relativity 0
solution conflict! Calculus & Beyond Homework 3