View Poll Results: For those who have used this book
Strongly Recommend 2 25.00%
Lightly Recommend 4 50.00%
Lightly don't Recommend 1 12.50%
Strongly don't Recommend 1 12.50%
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll

Register to reply

Solid State Introduction to Solid State Physics by Charles Kittel

by Greg Bernhardt
Tags: None
Share this thread:
Greg Bernhardt
#1
Jan19-13, 06:51 PM
Admin
Greg Bernhardt's Avatar
P: 9,070
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
New model helps explain how provisions promote or reduce wildlife disease
Stress can make hard-working mongooses less likely to help in the future
Grammatical habits in written English reveal linguistic features of non-native speakers' languages
A_B
#2
Feb1-13, 07:52 AM
P: 85
Hi,

I'm taking a course on Solid State Physics using this book. The reviews here and on amazon aren't very positive. Is there a good book you would suggest as a companion?


Thanks,

A_B
marcusl
#3
Feb11-13, 07:45 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,056
I think this is a wonderful book, with wide coverage of topics and nice explanations. Kittel always provides references to experimental results to compliment the discussions. I read many complaints about recent editions, especially the 7th and 8th. I highly recommend the 3rd edition.

StevieMurray
#4
Feb12-13, 11:42 AM
P: 3
Introduction to Solid State Physics by Charles Kittel

I'm reading the part about phonons in diatomic bases on pages 95-99 in the 8th edition. I might have confused myself but it seems like Kittel switched the directions for the NaCl and CsCl structure around on page 97. CsCl is a crystal with a simple cubic lattice and a basis of Cs at 000 and Cl at 1/2,1/2,1/2 so I would expect that one to be the one with a [111] direction. This doesn't show up in the errata pages I've found.
StevieMurray
#5
Feb14-13, 08:33 PM
P: 3
Nevermind. I took a long hard look at the 3D structures and it seems to be (mostly) correct.
M@2
#6
Feb18-13, 01:50 AM
P: 67
Quote Quote by Greg Bernhardt View Post
Exellent book. Especially 1953 year edition.

Quote Quote by Kittel
Recently there have been a number of attempts to give a quantum-
mechanical explanation of superconductivity. We mention work by
Heisenberg,28 Tisza,29 Slater,30 Born and Cheng,1 Frohlich,32 and
Bardeen.32 At the present time all these theories are highly contro-
versial, and the difficulties do not lend themselves to analysis in an
introductory textbook.
It has no subsequent ideas of Cooper pairing, preventing us of from understanding of HTS.

Quote Quote by Kittel
In every theory the apparent contradiction between the Bloch theorem and the observed persistence of currents in a superconducting ring is explained by the presumed metastable nature of the current distribution.
Anticipating words!!!
Bloch theorem must be corrected!!!
DaleSpam
#7
Feb18-13, 12:15 PM
Mentor
P: 16,943
Moderator's Note:

A discussion of BCS superconductivity theory has been moved from this thread. Please find them here:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthr...86#post4275186

Kindly restrict comments in this thread to reviews of this specific textbook, and post discussion about other references on BCS in the other thread.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Solid state physics: phonon density of state Advanced Physics Homework 0
Recommended Journals to Pair w/Introductory (Kittel) Solid State Class Academic Guidance 0
Solid State Physics A&M Advanced Physics Homework 0
Kittel's solid-state physics book Advanced Physics Homework 9