Register to reply

Eyepiece for refractor telescope

by PhysicoRaj
Tags: eyepiece, refractor, telescope
Share this thread:
PhysicoRaj
#1
Feb13-13, 11:06 PM
PF Gold
PhysicoRaj's Avatar
P: 436
Hi, Iam thinking of making my own telescope and I have a magnifying glass lens, biconvex, about 10 cm in diameter and 27 cm focal length. I think it would be better as the objective. For the eyepiece, what type of lens, of what focal length and aperture diameter should I use? (I hope to identify the rings of Saturn.... I may not be able to .. but at least the craters of the moon are okay.)
Thanks.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Wildfires and other burns play bigger role in climate change, professor finds
SR Labs research to expose BadUSB next week in Vegas
New study advances 'DNA revolution,' tells butterflies' evolutionary history
russ_watters
#2
Feb13-13, 11:15 PM
Mentor
P: 22,252
The rings of Saturn are a piece of cake, but with that short focal length, you'll need a short focal length eyepiece and maybe a Barlow.
PhysicoRaj
#3
Feb13-13, 11:49 PM
PF Gold
PhysicoRaj's Avatar
P: 436
Then what type of a configuration you suggest(focal length combination and size)? May be I will try to get both new, the eyepiece and the objective.

Andy Resnick
#4
Feb14-13, 08:24 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,513
Eyepiece for refractor telescope

Quote Quote by PhysicoRaj View Post
Hi, Iam thinking of making my own telescope and I have a magnifying glass lens, biconvex, about 10 cm in diameter and 27 cm focal length. I think it would be better as the objective. For the eyepiece, what type of lens, of what focal length and aperture diameter should I use? (I hope to identify the rings of Saturn.... I may not be able to .. but at least the craters of the moon are okay.)
Thanks.
The ratio of the objective and eyepiece focal lengths provides the (angular) magnification, so the shorter the focal length of the eyepiece, the greater the magnification. Using a negative (concave) lens for the eyepiece is worse than a positive lens when you are trying to look through the telescope (see Galilean vs. Keplerian telescopes).

http://depts.washington.edu/hssexec/...s_galileo.html

The f/# of your objective is 2.7, so the f-number of your eyepiece does not need to be much larger than 2.7 as well.

This simple analysis completely ignores aberrations, which are likely to be large.
glappkaeft
#5
Feb14-13, 08:30 AM
P: 82
A common simple refractor design is a 100 mm doublett lens with a focal length of 1000 mm. For maximum FoV you'd need a 50 mm eyepice. Together with a 2xbarlow lens and a second eyepiece around 12 mm. This way you'd get magnifications of 20, 40, 83 and 167.

I'd recommend that you start by getting your hands on a book on building telescopes and checking if there is an amateur astronomer club nearby. There are a lot of gotchas if you haven't built a telescope before.
PhysicoRaj
#6
Feb14-13, 09:32 AM
PF Gold
PhysicoRaj's Avatar
P: 436
Thanks a lot...


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Focal length eyepiece for telescope Introductory Physics Homework 16
Amateur telescope eyepiece filters Stargazing & Telescopes 4
A simple refractor homemade telescope Stargazing & Telescopes 6
Question on Refractor Telescope ! Stargazing & Telescopes 6
Refractor Telescopes Astronomy & Astrophysics 8