| Thread Closed |
a question from Weinberg's qft book |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jan6-06, 09:32 PM | #1 |
|
|
a question from Weinberg's qft book
can anybody tell me how to induce the quantum field theory
as long as you admit the quantum mechanics and the reletivity? it seems that in Weinberg's book ,he shows that,but i can not quite understand thank you
|
| PhysOrg.com |
physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Promising doped zirconia >> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease >> Bringing life into focus |
| Jan7-06, 08:50 AM | #2 |
|
|
Ok, we really cannot help you if you state your question like this. You need to be a whole lot more specific. What exactly do you want to know ? What concept are you not gettin' ? Please give some reference to a formula, approach, a "name", ... Also tell us something about your situation : are you a college student ?, undergrad ?, How's your QM and special relativity knowledge ?
regards marlon ps : i urge you not to use Weinberg's book to study intro QFT. Have you considered Zee's book (QFT in a Nutshell) ? Are you doing this in college ? |
| Jan7-06, 09:26 AM | #3 |
|
|
i am a student learning theoretical physics.and i hav read some chapters
of Zee's book.and i think i can follow his idea rather than Weinberg What i mean is that in many books such like Peskin's just tell us how to calculate,and it induce the qft so abruptly. So i think Wein's book will helpful.Maybe my question looks ugly and i think i get my answer myself now. but what i want to know now is that is qft just a tool in some sence? thank you
|
| Jan7-06, 02:05 PM | #4 |
|
|
a question from Weinberg's qft book
QFT is the theoretical model to describe the interactions of many particle systems, caracterized by the fact that the total number of particles does not need to be a constant. This actually is what the "second quantisation" is all about. Particles can be created and annihilated. The biggest difference between QM and QFT is
1) in QM, the total number of particles is constant 2) In QFT, the fundamental property are the FIELDS while in QM they are the wavefunctions. There are several quantum field theories like QED (describes the EM interaction), QCD (describes the strong force), etc etc marlon edit : check out this thread for further clarification |
| Jan9-06, 04:57 AM | #5 |
|
|
You can get QFT by simply applying canonical quantization to classical fields. There's nothing more to it.
Daniel. |
| Jan4-09, 01:51 PM | #6 |
|
|
Hi,
I recommend Dirac's Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. It is about 5 bucks and is well worth it. The 2nd lecture is "The Problem of Quantization". |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: a question from Weinberg's qft book
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Homotopy classes appendix in Weinberg's QFT book, Part I | General Physics | 1 | ||
| Weinberg's Book .. Get it! | Cosmology | 9 | ||
| Question to a detail in derivation of Weinberg's chiral sum rules | General Physics | 1 | ||
| Question to a detail in derivation of Weinberg's chiral sum rules | General Physics | 1 | ||
| [SOLVED] Homotopy classes appendix in Weinberg's QFT book, Part I | General Physics | 0 | ||