The General Definition of Instantaneous Speed: A Debate on V=dx/dt vs V=x/t

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter deda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definitions of instantaneous speed, specifically comparing the equations V = x/t and V = dx/dt. Participants explore the generality and applicability of each definition in various contexts, including linear and differentiable functions of time.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that V = dx/dt is more general because it applies to any differentiable function of time, while V = x/t is limited to linear relationships.
  • Others question how V = x/t could be considered more general, asking for specific scenarios where it would work better than V = dx/dt.
  • One participant asserts that V = x/t is not correct in general, suggesting that it only yields accurate results under specific conditions, such as when the displacement is linear with zero initial displacement.
  • Another participant challenges the interpretation of the equations, proposing that both definitions can be expressed in terms of x as a function of V and t, and that dx = Vdt is a special case when V is constant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness and generality of the two definitions of instantaneous speed. There is no consensus on which definition is superior, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the applicability of V = x/t, particularly its dependence on linearity and initial conditions. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of the relationship between the variables involved.

what definition is more general?

  • V=x/t

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • V=dx/dt

    Votes: 9 90.0%

  • Total voters
    10
deda
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Hurkyl probably remebers this post..

The main question of this debate is:
What definition for instaneous speed is more general:
1)[tex]V=\frac{x}{t}[/tex]
2)[tex]V=\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]?

the notification is standard.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Second definition is more general. x/t is only accurate if the x-displacement is strictly linear in time: x(t) = vt + c. The second definition will work for x(t) any differentiable function of time, which is a much bigger class of course, making the definition more general.
 
How could the first equation possibly be more general? In what situation does the first equation work and not the second?
 
The first equation is not correct. The second one is. The first equation will produce the proper units, and it may, under lucky circumstances, produce the proprer result, but it is not generally correct. Even in the linear case of x(t)=vt+c it is only correct if c=0.

Njorl
 
Originally posted by deda
Hurkyl probably remebers this post..

The main question of this debate is:
What definition for instaneous speed is more general:
1)[tex]V=\frac{x}{t}[/tex]
2)[tex]V=\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]?

the notification is standard.

If notification are standard Then the 2 is also standard look at poll results
 
Originally posted by Njorl
The first equation is not correct. The second one is. The first equation will produce the proper units, and it may, under lucky circumstances, produce the proprer result, but it is not generally correct. Even in the linear case of x(t)=vt+c it is only correct if c=0.

Njorl
where from is your conclusion "x=f(t)" when both from the 1st and the 2nd option we have x=f(V,t)?

regarding x(t)=vt+c i can say only this:
dx=Vdt <=>
dx=Vdt+tdV and dV=0 <=>
[tex]\int_{x_0}^{x}dx=\int_{V_0t_0}^{Vt}d(Vt)[/tex] <=>
[tex]x-x_0=Vt-V_0t_0[/tex] <=>
[tex]x=Vt[/tex] and [tex]x_0=V_0t_0[/tex]
in general for every corresponding x,V and t it's
x=f(V,t)=Vt[/color]
while dx=Vdt is special case of x=Vt when V=const.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K