Stuck on surface change density problem.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the surface charge density for a solid spherical conductor given its radius and potential. The original poster presents their calculations and expresses uncertainty regarding the electric field used in the process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of total charge and surface charge density, with some attempting to derive the surface charge density from the total charge divided by the surface area of the sphere. Others question the accuracy of the radius used in the potential equation and the definition of the electric field at the surface of the sphere.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to the problem, with participants sharing their calculations and questioning each other's methods. Some express uncertainty about specific values and the reasoning behind certain formulas, while others seek clarification on the correct interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is part of an online homework assignment, and answers are not available until after the due date. There is also mention of potential confusion regarding the units of voltage and the implications of using different values in calculations.

NINHARDCOREFAN
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
Stuck on surface charge density problem.

Calculate the surface charge density for a solid spherical conductor of radius .438m if the potential is .876m from the center of the sphere is 1.87kV. Answer in units of C/m^2

Ok I did this:
V= Kq/r
q= V*r/k
q= 1.87e-3*.876/8.99e9
q= 1.822e-13

E= kq/r^2
E= 8.99e9*1.88e-13/.438^2
E= 8.809e-3

SCD= 2*epsilon*E
SCD= 1.559e-13

But it's wrong.

The only thing I'm not sure about is the Electric field.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am learning this material right now, but here goes a stab:

I think you calculated the total charge of the sphere correctly.
Assuming that q=1.822*10^-13, I think the next step is to simply divide this by the area of the sphere:
SCD=Q/A
SCD=1.822*10^-13 (C)/ 4*pi*r^2
SCD=1.822*10^-13 (C)/ 4*pi*(.438m)^2
SCD=1.822*10^-13 (C)/ 4*pi*(.191844m^2)
SCD=7.55*10^-14 (C/m^2)

I hope that is the answer. If not, I would really like someone else to let us know where our errors are. I am learning this material too, but figured I would give it a try.

Thanks.
 
Your radial distance in your potential equation is incorrect. Also, why are you trying to find the E-field at the surface of the sphere? That is going to be ill-defined. Listen to paul he has the correct method. Also 1.87 kV = 1.87e+3 V not to e-3.
Good luck.
 
...

I am learning this material right now, but here goes a stab:

I think you calculated the total charge of the sphere correctly.
Assuming that q=1.822*10^-13, I think the next step is to simply divide this by the area of the sphere:
SCD=Q/A
SCD=1.822*10^-13 (C)/ 4*pi*r^2
SCD=1.822*10^-13 (C)/ 4*pi*(.438m)^2
SCD=1.822*10^-13 (C)/ 4*pi*(.191844m^2)
SCD=7.55*10^-14 (C/m^2)

I hope that is the answer. If not, I would really like someone else to let us know where our errors are. I am learning this material too, but figured I would give it a try.

Thanks.
Forgot to tell that I also tried that. Thanks for trying though.

Your radial distance in your potential equation is incorrect. Also, why are you trying to find the E-field at the surface of the sphere? That is going to be ill-defined. Listen to paul he has the correct method. Also 1.87 kV = 1.87e+3 V not to e-3.
Good luck
When using V in calculations, it should be in V not KV so that's why it's 1.87e-3
 
At the risk of sounding dumb, what should his radius be in the potential equation?
 
At the risk of sounding dumb, what should his radius be in the potential equation?

radius .438m if the potential is .876m
.876m because it's telling the potential from that distance. You did the same calculations as I did.
 
Since you seem to know E JUST outside the conductor, I found in my text where:

E=SCD/epsilon

So can we use this rearranged to solve for SCD?
 
I did that, it's in the first post but it's wrong I don't know why

SCD= 2*epsilon*E
SCD= 1.559e-13
 
Right, I should have realized before I posted that is where the 2*epsilon*E came from. I guess I thought I was onto something and got excited. Should have ran the numbers first.

Does you book have an answer for this problem? Maybe we can back into it?
 
  • #10
This is an online howework question. Answers aren't posted until after the due date.
 
  • #11
2*epsilon*E

Where does the 2 come from?
 
  • #12
I am calling it a night. I will pick up with this one in the morning. Hopefully I will be a little sharper.
 
  • #13
Never mind my friend did it for me, he got 7.558366e-8 and it's right
 
  • #14
Can you let me know how he got that? I am curious now.
 
  • #15
Q = ( bigR * V ) / K

then Q / a
a = 4pi small r ^2

V= 1870

that's where we went wrong
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K