| Thread Closed |
Can you 'fool' a proximity sensor? |
Share Thread |
| Jul3-07, 07:26 PM | #1 |
|
|
Can you 'fool' a proximity sensor?
I own a small one that that can detect metallic objects. Automotive use. I believe most (if not all) are based off of an inductive loop design. Anyway, I was playing around with it and a some coins and the question popped into my head....
Is it possible to 'trick' an inductive loop into not being able to detect or see a metal object? Brett |
| Jul4-07, 01:35 AM | #2 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 9
|
Not clear, what you mean by fool. Proximity sensors of all sorts can fail, but for the most part they are extremely reliable. They only fail if physically abused or become mechanially mis aligned.
|
| Jul4-07, 10:03 AM | #3 |
|
|
|
| Jul11-07, 05:53 PM | #4 |
|
|
Can you 'fool' a proximity sensor?
Probably not, sensors which are based on earths magnetic field changes like traffic sensors, are hard to pass, anything that affects into a field may trigger the sensor. Even if trying to jam the field with an another field would be very difficult as you dont know the reference level. In theory, you might have a chance to create a field which is negative to that field that is affecting to a sensor, creating a +- zero situation to a sensor "sight". But as i said, that is nearly impossible, sensors are very accurate and sensitive.
But if you are not affecting into a sensor you may pass it. In traffic, someone told that a motorbike or a sports cars done with a carbon fibres could pass those sensors. |
| Jul11-07, 07:38 PM | #5 |
|
Mentor
|
And to the original question, yes, you can make a circuit that would actively pick up the detector signal and emit a signal that compensated for the metal object. There are some limitations in terms of sizes and geometries, naturally. |
| Jul12-07, 05:34 AM | #6 |
|
|
Berkeman, i agree, AC loops wont work with earths magnetic field. However, there are different types of sensors available like Honeywell. They have sensors to detect vehicles with a different principle of detection. They are based on earths magnetic field variations caused by a vehicle near to it.
You may read about them from here: http://www.ssec.honeywell.com/magnet...eets/an218.pdf As the sensor technology has inproved the last few years rapidly, and making them easier and cheaper than the "old technology", i assume that AC loops may be a history in a while... who knows. |
| Jul12-07, 11:02 AM | #7 |
|
Mentor
|
|
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Can you 'fool' a proximity sensor?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Studying advice for a fool. | Academic Guidance | 8 | ||
| Modeling of an inductive proximity sensor | General Physics | 0 | ||
| Proximity sensor with LDR | Advanced Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| Proximity controlled circut | Electrical Engineering | 1 | ||
| Do you dare to make a fool of yourself? | Current Events | 22 | ||