Calculating the Decay Constant of Carbon 14

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the decay constant of Carbon-14, given its half-life of 5730 years. Participants explore the relationship between half-life and decay constant in the context of radioactive decay.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulas relating half-life and decay constant, with some attempting to apply these formulas to derive the decay constant. Questions arise about the relevance of Avogadro's number and the interpretation of decay rate versus decay constant.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering hints and clarifications regarding the conversion between half-life and decay constant. There is an exploration of different interpretations of the formulas involved, but no consensus has been reached on the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the definitions of decay rate and decay constant, indicating a need for further clarification on these concepts. The original poster's use of specific values and constants is also questioned.

EIRE2003
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
Carbon14 has a half life of 5730 yrs. This is the only information i am given.

Caluculate the decay constant of Carbon 14.

This is what I have done.

dN/dt = -lambda(N)

I know the Avogadro Constant is equal to 6x10^23

So i am using 1kg in my formula.

14C = 6 x 10^23 x 1000/14

where do i go from here??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Half life and decay constant are just two ways of expressing the rate of radioactive decay. Half life (T) uses a base of 2:
X = X_0 2^{-\frac{t}{T_{half}}}

Decay constant (λ) uses a base of "e":
X = X_0 e^{-\lambda t}

You can convert from one to the other. Hint: 2 = e^?
 
ok i used dN/dt

which is 0.693 x 6 x 10^23/5730x 360 x 24 x 3600 x 14
which is equal to 3 x 10^28 s^-1

Is that right??
 
Remeber that 1/λ is going to be equal to the mean lifetime of a C-14 particle, your figure gives a mean lifetime of about 3 x 10^-29 seconds, the mean lifetime is always longer than the half-life so the anbswer MUST be wrong.

Use Dr. Al's hints.
 
Avogadro's number is irrelevant.
2 = e^{0.693}
so... \lambda = \frac{0.693}{T_{half}}
 
Ah i don't understand it.
Im looking at an example in a book and it has the second formula he gives,

ie N=No e^-lambda t

therefore dN/dt=-No Lambda e ^-lambda t = - lambda N

When N =12, dN/dt = -lambda 10^12

Now lambda = 0.693 / T1/2
 
decay rate vs. decay constant?

Perhaps you are confusing decay rate (which is dN/dt) with decay constant (which is λ)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K