Register to reply 
*sigh* volatage divider...? 
Share this thread: 
#1
Jul108, 01:07 AM

P: 343

I've been going over basic circuitry and got to the voltage divider. I don't understand the proof here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage...r#General_case The first line makes sense. From Vi to Ground there are two resistors in series, so you add them, and V = IR and I is the same all around the whole circuit. Then the 2nd line I don't get. Why is it R2 and not R1? I thought current would go From Vi through R1 and then to Vo, not Ground to Vo. 


#2
Jul108, 03:28 AM

HW Helper
P: 2,616

The potential difference across R2 (or Z2) is given by [itex]V_{out}  0[/itex], where 0 is the ground voltage. For a resistor, V = IR so this means [itex]V_{out}  0 = IR_2[/tex]



#3
Jul108, 12:13 PM

P: 343

Let me see if I have this right.
Current goes from Vin through R1, which gives a voltage drop. Then since there is a branch, i.e. two things are in parallel, V across both is equal, but current probably isn't. So then you exploit the fact that at V at the branching point = Vout, and then you do this: 


#4
Jul108, 07:58 PM

HW Helper
P: 2,616

*sigh* volatage divider...?
Actually there isn't any "branch" in between R1 and R2. In fact I would say that if there is a branch there, the voltage divider principle does not work. It works only if the circuit elements are connected in series, which they would not be if there was a branch in between.



#5
Aug1908, 10:15 PM

P: 343

Sorry to revive this. I'm back in "electronics" mode and still stuck on this damn problem again...
By branch I mean it branches off between R1 and R2 to Vout. I guess my next question is how do they know Iin = Iout? Wouldn't it be Vin = I_in(R1 + R2) and Vout = Iout*R2? Why do they use the same value for I? EDIT: Or are you assuming it's an open circuit, so that no current actually goes to the right into Vout? Then how would that work with a Load? 


#6
Aug1908, 10:26 PM

HW Helper
P: 2,616

The diagram is a little misleading. Vout does not denote a wire connected in between R1 and R2. It's just a line which indicates that the potential between the two resistors is V2. The same goes for Vin.
Iin = Iout is the assumption they make in order to derive the voltage divider principle. As said above, if that assumption is not true, ie. if there is a wire branching off from in between 2 resistors, then the potential divider principle does not work. 


#7
Aug1908, 10:28 PM

P: 343

Okay okay, that much makes sense. So how do you apply a voltage divider if you're not allowed to have anything between R1 and R2? I thought that was the whole point, where you kind of siphon off some of the current.



#8
Aug1908, 10:33 PM

HW Helper
P: 2,616

The voltage divider principle is just a principle of circuits for easy evaluation of voltages across a circuit element, not a technique for getting a desired voltage out of something. To get a desired voltage across some complicated linear network, you first reduce it to it's Thevenin equivalent, then add resistors in the appropriate manner until you get the desired voltage.



#9
Aug1908, 10:38 PM

P: 343

I see... but if I had Rload at Vout >> R1 and R2, wouldn't that be approximately correct still?
So if I used a voltmeter I could still read Vout from in between R1 and R2, right? I guess that's what confused me above all. I had thought this was something practical, not just a thought experiment type of thing. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
What is the formula to solve for RPM to volatage output in a generator  Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework  2  
Develop a Variable volatage divider...  Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework  2  
Pd (volatage)/ resistance  Introductory Physics Homework  2  
How do voltagedivider & currentdivider work; physically?  General Physics  2  
::sigh:: What now?  Differential Equations  7 