Register to reply

Dimensions and the Generating Functional

by TriTertButoxy
Tags: dimensions, functional, generating
Share this thread:
Sep20-08, 10:58 PM
P: 194
Something seems a little weird to me: What are the dimensions of a generating functional, [itex]Z[j][/itex] -- say for real scalar field theory?

[tex]Z[j]=\int\mathcal{D}\phi\,\exp\, i\!\int d^4x\left(\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu\phi\partial^\mu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2+j\phi\right)[/tex]

Also, what about mass dimensions of the generating functional for connected Green's functions, [itex]W[j][/itex]? This is defined in terms of the log of the generating functional, [itex]Z[j][/itex].


This seems a little pathological...
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
A new, tunable device for spintronics
Watching the structure of glass under pressure
New imaging technique shows how cocaine shuts down blood flow in mouse brains
Sep22-08, 06:59 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 1,205
Both Z and W are dimensionless. This is obvious for W, since you couldn't put it into the exponential if it wasn't. As for Z, it's usually defined as the vacuum-to-vacuum transition amplitude in the presence of the source j, and this equals one if there is no source, so Z[0]=1. Thus Z[j] must be dimensionless. To get Z[0]=1, a normalization factor must be implicitly included in the measure over the fields.

None of this is specific to field theory. Similar statements apply to path integrals in NRQMOP (non-relavitistic quantum mechanics of one particle ).
Sep23-08, 12:10 AM
P: 194
Ah, so you mean in order for Z[0]=1, the integration measure, [itex]\mathcal{D}\phi[/itex], must be normalized such that it is unitless.

I understand now. thanks, Avodyne!

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Generating EM radiation Classical Physics 5
Generating Functions Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Generating functions Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
9 Space Dimensions 2 Time Dimensions General Physics 7