How Should Charge q Be Allocated for Maximum Force on Two Objects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Air
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Force
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two small objects with charges, where charge q is transferred from one object with charge Q to another initially neutral object. The objects are positioned 1 meter apart, and the goal is to determine how to allocate charge q to maximize the force between them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for the force between the charges and question how to express the charges in terms of Q and q. There is exploration of differentiating the force function to find its maximum value.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing insights about differentiating the force equation and discussing the implications of their calculations. Some have reached a conclusion regarding the value of q that maximizes the force, while others emphasize the importance of verifying the nature of the critical point found.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring that the charges are correctly defined as Q1 and Q2 based on the transfer of charge q, and participants are considering the implications of their assumptions in the context of the problem.

Air
Messages
202
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small object has charge [itex]Q[/itex]. Charge [itex]q[/itex] is removed from it and placed on a second small object. The two objects are placed [itex]1[/itex] meter apart. For the force that each object exerts on each other to be a maximum, q should be:


Homework Equations


[itex]F=\frac{kQ_1Q_2}{r^2}[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution


The correct answer is [itex]\frac{Q}{2}[/itex] although I can't seem to get to that. Is my formula selection correct. Also, if force is maximum, which value do I cosider it as. Thanks for the guidence in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Air said:

Homework Statement


A small object has charge [itex]Q[/itex]. Charge [itex]q[/itex] is removed from it and placed on a second small object. The two objects are placed [itex]1[/itex] meter apart. For the force that each object exerts on each other to be a maximum, q should be:


Homework Equations


[itex]F=\frac{kQ_1Q_2}{r^2}[/itex]

Good; here [itex]r=1\text{m}[/itex], so you might as well write this as [itex]F=kQ_1Q_2[/itex] and not worry too much about the units.

Now, what are [itex]Q_1[/itex] and [itex]Q_2[/itex] for this problem (in terms of 'Q' and 'q')?


Also, if force is maximum, which value do I cosider it as. Thanks for the guidence in advance.

Well, you should have an equation for your force that is a function of 'q'; if I gave you some function of x and asked you to find the value of x that gives maximum value of that function, how would you do it? Apply the same idea to the force as a function of q.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Well, you should have an equation for your force that is a function of 'q'; if I gave you some function of x and asked you to find the value of x that gives maximum value of that function, how would you do it? Apply the same idea to the force as a function of q.

It it was function of [itex]x[/itex], I would differentiate to find the maximum and equate it zero. How is that relevant?

EDIT: [itex]F = KQ^2\implies \frac{\mathrm{d}F}{\mathrm{d}Q} = 2KQ[/itex]. Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Air said:
It it was function of [itex]x[/itex], I would differentiate to find the maximum and equate it zero. How is that relevant?

Well, if you have a function of x you differentiate with respect to x and set it equal to zero.

So, if you have a function of q, why not differentiate it with respect to q and set it equal to zero? :wink:
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Well, if you have a function of x you differentiate with respect to x and set it equal to zero.

So, if you have a function of q, why not differentiate it with respect to q and set it equal to zero? :wink:

Ok, So if [itex]F=kQ_1Q_2[/itex], we can consider the charge to be [itex]F=kQ^2[/itex] hence as [itex]F = KQ^2\implies \frac{\mathrm{d}F}{\mathrm{d}Q} = 2KQ[/itex].

[itex]2KQ = 0 \implies Q=0[/itex]. Hmmm... Is my error that I changed [itex]Q_1Q_2[/itex] to [itex]Q^2[/itex]? :redface:
 
Air said:
EDIT: [itex]F = KQ^2\implies \frac{\mathrm{d}F}{\mathrm{d}Q} = 2KQ[/itex]. Is this correct?

Right idea, but are [itex]Q_1[/itex] and [itex]Q_2[/itex] really both equal to [itex]Q[/itex]?

If the first object starts out with charge [itex]Q[/itex] and you take away an amount [itex]q[/itex] how much is left? Call that [itex]Q_1[/itex].

If the second object starts out neutral and you add an amount of charge [itex]q[/itex], what is the charge on that object? Call that [itex]Q_2[/itex].
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Right idea, but are [itex]Q_1[/itex] and [itex]Q_2[/itex] really both equal to [itex]Q[/itex]?

If the first object starts out with charge [itex]Q[/itex] and you take away an amount [itex]q[/itex] how much is left? Call that [itex]Q_1[/itex].

If the second object starts out neutral and you add an amount of charge [itex]q[/itex], what is the charge on that object? Call that [itex]Q_2[/itex].

[itex]F=k(Q-q)(q)[/itex]

[itex]F=KQq - Kq^2[/itex]

[itex]\frac{\mathrm{d}F}{\mathrm{d}q} = KQ - 2kq[/itex]

When derivative equated to zero, max can be found: [itex]0 = KQ - 2kq \implies KQ = 2Kq \therefore q = \frac{Q}{2}[/itex].

Woo, it works. I got the correct answer. Thanks a lot for the great help. You've been very patient and I appreciate the help. Thanks once again. :smile:
 
Air said:
[itex]F=k(Q-q)(q)[/itex]

[itex]F=KQq - Kq^2[/itex]

[itex]\frac{\mathrm{d}F}{\mathrm{d}q} = KQ - 2kq[/itex]

When derivative equated to zero, max can be found: [itex]0 = KQ - 2kq \implies KQ = 2Kq \therefore q = \frac{Q}{2}[/itex].

Woo, it works. I got the correct answer. Thanks a lot for the great help. You've been very patient and I appreciate the help. Thanks once again. :smile:

That's much better!:smile:

You should also check that the second derivative is negative so that you can be sure that you've found the maximum value and not the minimum value.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
That's much better!:smile:

You should also check that the second derivative is negative so that you can be sure that you've found the maximum value and not the minimum value.

Yes, [itex]\frac{\mathrm{d}^2F}{\mathrm{d}q^2} = -2q[/itex] Which is negative hence it's a maximum.
 
  • #10
Looks good to me :approve:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K