Thread Closed

limit of a mountain using universal gravitation

 
Share Thread
Jan30-10, 04:32 PM   #1
 

limit of a mountain using universal gravitation


The height of a mountain is limited by the ability of the atoms at the bottom to sustain the weight of the materials above them. Assuming that the tallest mountains on Earth (at about 8850m) are near this limit, how tall could that mountain be on Mars, with mass .11Me and radius .53 Re?

I know that this should include the equation:
F=G(m1*m2/R^2) but I don't understand how. To be honest I don't understand how one could possibly find an actual number from this limited information. (it is a multiple choice answer question, and all the choices are numbers. However, I would rather solve it myself so I can understand the concept.)
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
Jan31-10, 04:05 PM   #2
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 10
Hint: what would the value of g be on the surface of Mars?
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: limit of a mountain using universal gravitation
Thread Forum Replies
Universal Gravitation Introductory Physics Homework 2
Universal Gravitation Introductory Physics Homework 4
Universal Gravitation Introductory Physics Homework 1
Universal Mountain/Sea Thermometer General Physics 11
Universal Gravitation Introductory Physics Homework 3