Are Photons Always Wave Packets or Can They Be Plane Waves?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter touqra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Photon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of photons, specifically whether they can be considered wave packets or if they are always plane waves. Participants explore concepts related to quantum mechanics, measurement accuracy, and the implications of detecting photons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that photons can form wave packets, while others argue that a photon with an infinite delta-x implies it is a plane wave.
  • It is noted that a single photon can be detected, and the size of the detection spot is non-zero, indicating that photons are not always plane waves.
  • One participant suggests that photons emitted from a confined space do not have infinite delta-x, supporting the idea that they can be wave packets.
  • There is a discussion about the conditions under which photons may be considered plane waves versus wave packets, with some suggesting that photons are never exactly momentum eigenstates.
  • Questions are raised regarding the possibility of detecting a photon's location with 100% accuracy and the implications for the speed of light limit in relativity.
  • Participants discuss the mechanics of photon detection, clarifying that photons are typically detected through interactions with other particles, such as electrons, rather than directly with other photons.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on whether photons are always wave packets or can be plane waves, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the conditions for each state.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of wave packets and plane waves, as well as the unresolved nature of measurement accuracy in quantum mechanics.

touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
Can photon form wavepackets? I mean we can't detect the location of a photon right? So this means delta x is infinity, which implies that photon is a plane wave, which is not a wavepacket?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not exactly. You can detect a single photon, with the usual rules for the accuracy in position and momentum. You can actually see a single spot on a screen for instance, if the luminosity of the source is very small. The actual size of the spot is of-course non-zero. It is also true that, before you detect it, the photon with a well defined wavelegth is a plane wave. Depending on how it has been created, the indeterminacy in wavelength can be more or less large. Laser photons have a vanishingly small wavelegth undeterminacy.

A plane wave is a trivial wavepacket.
 
Suppose a photon is emitted from a light source inside a box with walls that won't let photons through. This photon obviously doesn't have delta-x equal to infinity.

The answers to your questions are: Yes, photon states can be "wave packets", and no, they aren't always plane waves (=momentum eigenstates).
 
humanino said:
Not exactly. You can detect a single photon, with the usual rules for the accuracy in position and momentum. You can actually see a single spot on a screen for instance, if the luminosity of the source is very small. The actual size of the spot is of-course non-zero. It is also true that, before you detect it, the photon with a well defined wavelegth is a plane wave. Depending on how it has been created, the indeterminacy in wavelength can be more or less large. Laser photons have a vanishingly small wavelegth undeterminacy.

A plane wave is a trivial wavepacket.

Fredrick said:
Suppose a photon is emitted from a light source inside a box with walls that won't let photons through. This photon obviously doesn't have delta-x equal to infinity.

The answers to your questions are: Yes, photon states can be "wave packets", and no, they aren't always plane waves (=momentum eigenstates).

When will they be plane waves? And when will they be wave packets, beside the situation where you mentioned?

I agree with your explanations but I have a question. As in for other particles like electron, that we can detect exactly its position, can we detect a photon's location with 100% accuracy compromising our knowledge on its wavelength? If we can detect it 100% accurate, does this violate the speed of light limit of relativity?
A detector uses electromagnetic wave in some way for any detections. How could you detect a photon with a photon?
 
Last edited:
touqra said:
When will they be plane waves? And when will they be wave packets, beside the situation where you mentioned?
A plane wave is a momentum eigenstate. A wave packet is a superposition of momentum eigenstates. The state of the photon is never exactly a momentum eigenstate, so I suppose you can say it's always a wave packet, or at least that it's never a plane wave. (Its momentum-space wave function can be "sharp", but never quite as sharp as the Dirac delta function).

touqra said:
As in for other particles like electron, that we can detect exactly its position, can we detect a photon's location with 100% accuracy compromising our knowledge on its wavelength? If we can detect it 100% accurate, does this violate the speed of light limit of relativity?
A detector uses electromagnetic wave in some way for any detections. How could you detect a photon with a photon?
I don't think we can detect anything with 100% accuracy. When it comes to measuring positions, the best we can do is to determine a region of space where the particle is. After the measurement, the wave function will be 0 outside that region.

I don't see why accurate measurements would violate the relativistic speed limit.

You wouldn't detect photons with photons. You would have the photon knock an electron loose from the surface it hits, and amplify the signal until you get a measureable current. This is roughly how a photomultiplier works.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K