| New Reply |
unitary operators preserve normalization in arbitrary basis |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Oct25-10, 11:29 AM | #1 |
|
|
unitary operators preserve normalization in arbitrary basis
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
To test my knowledge of Sakurai, I asked myself to: "Prove that an operator being unitary is independent of basis." 3. The attempt at a solution I want to show the expansion coefficients’ squared magnitudes sum to unity at time “t”, given that they do at time t = t0. Consider expanding an arbitrary –ket at t0, in the arbitrary basis a’, [tex]\left| {\alpha ,{t_0}} \right\rangle = {\bf{I}}\left| {\alpha ,{t_0}} \right\rangle = \left( {\sum\nolimits_{a'} {\left| {a'} \right\rangle \left\langle {a'} \right|} } \right)\left| {\alpha ,{t_0}} \right\rangle = \sum\nolimits_{a'} {\left| {a'} \right\rangle \left\langle {a'|\alpha ,{t_0}} \right\rangle } = \sum\nolimits_{a'} {{c_{a'}}({t_0}) \cdot \left| {a'} \right\rangle } [/tex] Note that the work directly above is a ket that has not yet time-evolved, so the expansion using the identity-operator and the notation of the expansion coefficients[tex]{c_{a'}}({t_0}) = \left\langle {a'|\alpha ,{t_0}} \right\rangle [/tex], is still our “business-as-usual” expansion from Chapter 1. Now, consider a ket, whatever that ket may be, at some later time “t”. The time “t” is just a label, so we can use the same procedure that we used in [I.8] to construct the time-evolved ket, [tex]\left| {\alpha ,t} \right\rangle = \sum\nolimits_{a'} {{c_{a'}}(t) \cdot \left| {a'} \right\rangle } [/tex] So we see that in [I.8] and [I.9], we have two sets of coefficients, and , respectively. I’m not sure how these two sets of coefficients are related to one another....well, I know they sum to unity in both bases. Can't find the expression for how coefficients change in a basis! :-P What's the expression for the coefficients in an expansion before and after a basis-switch? |
| Oct25-10, 12:58 PM | #2 |
|
|
I am not sure if that is what you want, but:
Write [tex]|\alpha,t\rangle=U(t-t_0)|\alpha,t_0\rangle[/tex] Then you can calculate [tex]c_{a''}(t)[/tex] in terms of [tex]c_{a'}(t_0)[/tex] and matrix elements [tex]\langle a''|U(t-t_0)|a'\rangle[/tex] |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: unitary operators preserve normalization in arbitrary basis
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| unitary operators | General Math | 3 | ||
| Unitary Operators | General Physics | 0 | ||
| QM: Arbitrary operators and their eigenstates | Advanced Physics Homework | 14 | ||
| Unitary Operators and Lorentz Transformations | Advanced Physics Homework | 5 | ||
| unitary operators | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 12 | ||