| New Reply |
predicate calculus |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Aug9-11, 08:40 AM | #1 |
|
|
predicate calculus
Given the following :
1)[itex]\forall x\forall y\forall z G(F(F(x,y),z),F(x,F(y,z)))[/itex] 2)[itex]\forall xG(F(x,c),x)[/itex] 3)[itex]\forall x\exists yG(F(x,y),c)[/itex] 4)[itex]\forall x\forall yG(F(x,y),F(y,x))[/itex]. 5) [itex]\forall x\forall y\forall z ( G(x,y)\wedge G(x,z)\Longrightarrow G(y,z))[/itex] Where G is a two place predicate symbol. F ,is a two place term symbol and c is a constant. Prove :[itex]\exists! y\forall xG(F(x,y),x)[/itex] [itex]\exists ! y[/itex] means : there exists a unique y |
| Aug9-11, 11:05 PM | #2 |
|
|
Is this a homework question, or just for fun, or what?
And I am assuming that E! x ph <-> E. y A. x ( x = y <-> ph ), right? |
| Aug10-11, 05:11 AM | #3 |
|
|
This is a problem given to me by a friend ,that i could not solve out.
This two place predicate and term is very confusing. |
| Aug10-11, 12:12 PM | #4 |
|
|
predicate calculus
Is "c" a constant or a variable? Because if it is a variable, then you can prove a contradiction given the conclusion and given that there are at least 2 distinct values of x.
We could prove that A. y A. x G ( F ( x , y ) x ) given 2, which contradicts the conclusion. |
| Aug10-11, 06:54 PM | #5 |
|
|
I have mention it already in my opening post that c is a constant
|
| Aug13-11, 06:42 PM | #6 |
|
|
Well, existence is straight forward:
From 2) and c [tex]\exists c \wedge \forall x G(F(x,c),x) \Rightarrow \exists y \forall x G(F(x,y),x)[/tex] uniqueness is left as an exercise: [tex]\forall u(\forall x G(F(x,u),x) \Rightarrow u=c)[/tex] |
| Aug13-11, 06:53 PM | #7 |
|
|
When you take G the equality, then your list of axioms is that of a commutative group. The thing you need to prove is that the identity element is unique.
Take two identity's c and c', then 3) G(F(c',c),c') and 3) G(F(c,c'),c) and 4) G(F(c,c'),F(c',c)) So by (5), we get that G(c,c') But that doesn't give equality, however... |
| Aug13-11, 07:01 PM | #8 |
|
|
OK, what about this counterexample:
Take [itex]\mathbb{Z}_0[/itex] as universe. Take [itex]G(x,y)~\text{if and only if}~\frac{x}{y}\geq 0[/itex] and F(x,y)=x*y and c=1. Then y=1 and y=2 both satisfy the hypothesis. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: predicate calculus
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Set Theory and Predicate Calculus? | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 4 | ||
| proof in predicate calculus | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 9 | ||
| proof in predicate calculus | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 1 | ||
| Predicate calculus: Proof problem (please check for me) | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 10 | ||
| Predicate Logic help please | Introductory Physics Homework | 7 | ||