Baffled by Electric Field of a Plate

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the electric field generated by a thin conducting plate in an external electric field. For a conducting plate, the correct formula to use is E = sigma_inclosed/epsilon_naught, which accounts for the total charge on the surfaces. However, the confusion arises when applying the formula E = sigma/2(epsilon_naught) for the electric field due to each face of the plate. The participants clarify that the superposition principle can be used to derive the effective electric field, leading to the conclusion that the total charge density on each face must be calculated to ensure the internal electric field remains zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts and equations
  • Knowledge of charge density and its implications in conductors
  • Basic principles of superposition in electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Gauss' Law applications for different geometries
  • Learn about electric field calculations for conductors and insulators
  • Explore the concept of superposition in electric fields
  • Investigate charge distribution on conductors in external fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatics and electric fields in conductive materials.

mborn
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have this question:
I am a little confused about the electric field of a very large sheet of something (insulator or conductor)
for a very large sheet, E = sigma_inclosed/2(epsilon_naught), but for a conductor, it is E = sigma_inclosed/epsilon_naught, that is, twice the first case. But I have a question here in my book that says:

A thin conducting plate 50 cm on a length lies in the x-y plane. If it is placed in an external electric field of 8*10^4C directed perpendicular to the plate, find;
1- The charge density of each face of the plate,
2- The total charge on each face.

The answers uses, E = sigma / 2(epsilon_naught) to find sigma,

Shouldn't he used the formula E = sigma_inclosed/epsilon_naught since it is a conducting plate?


M B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you're right. It depends on whether they are using Eext, or a different E. Eext=sigma/epsilon_naught.

You can also solve the problem by thinking of superposition (which is where I'm guessing they used sigma/2epsilon_naught). The field produced by the top positive sheet alone is sigma/2epsilon_naught. The field produced by the bottom sheet alone is -sigma/2epsilon_naught. They add together in the center (between the two sheets), and need to cancel the external field. So sigma/2epsilon_naught+sigma/2epsilon_naught=Eext. Then we get the initial result: sigma/epsilon_naught=Eext.

What is the value of sigma they get?
 
mborn said:
The answers uses, E = sigma / 2(epsilon_naught) to find sigma,

Shouldn't he used the formula E = sigma_inclosed/epsilon_naught since it is a conducting plate?
This is a little tricky. One has to apply Gauss' law to each surface of the conductor sheet. For a conductor, all charge resides on the top and bottom surfaces with 0 field inside.

Using Gauss' law, the flux per unit area through the top surface is: [itex]\phi = \sigma_{top} \delta A/\epsilon_0[/itex]. Since the flux goes in both directions, above the surface and into the interior, the flux from the top surface charge above + the flux from the top surface below (ie toward the inside of the conductor) is the total flux. So
[tex]E\delta a_{up} + E\delta a_{interior} = \sigma_{top} \delta a/\epsilon_0[/tex]
Since the surface charge produces equal flux in the up and down directions:
[tex]E\delta a_{up} = E\delta a_{interior}[/tex]
then:
[tex]2E = \sigma_{top}/\epsilon_0[/tex]

The same applies to the bottom surface of the conductor. You have to work out the charge densities on the top and bottom surfaces such that the field inside the conductor is 0 in the presence of the external field.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K