How to Calculate Time Required for Investment to Quadruple at 7.1% Interest

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Final Review
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the time required for an investment to quadruple at a continuous interest rate of 7.1%. Participants are exploring the appropriate mathematical approach to this problem.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are considering the formula for continuous compounding and questioning its application. There is discussion about substituting values and the implications of setting the initial investment amount.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the use of the continuous compounding formula, while others are clarifying the steps involved in solving for time. There is an ongoing exploration of how to manipulate the equation without reaching a consensus on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the relevance of the initial investment amount in the context of the exponential equation, noting that it cancels out in the calculations.

courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
Hello all

Just had a question about interest:

Determine how much time is required for an investmnent to quadruple if interest is earned at a rate of 7.1% compunded continuously.

Would I just use the formula [tex]Pe^ r^t[/tex]? And then just substitute values (say P = 0)?


Any help is appreciated

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know whether I can use the above formula.
 
My first guess is "yes"...The key words are "compounded continuously"...

Daniel.
 
So

[tex]Pe^r^t = Pe^0.071^t[/tex]

[tex]Pe^r^t = 4Pe^0^.^0^7^1^t[/tex]

Is this right so far?

Thanks
 
Shouldn't it be something like:

[tex]P(t)=P_{0}e^{0.071t}=4P_{0}[/tex]

Daniel.
 
yes you are right. Then how would you solve for t? Would you initially set [tex]P_0[/tex] to any number?
 
courtrigrad said:
yes you are right. Then how would you solve for t? Would you initially set [tex]P_0[/tex] to any number?

The [itex]P_0[/itex] cancels out and you're left with a simple exponential equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K