New Reply

finding a potential function

 
Share Thread
May30-12, 01:34 AM   #1
 

finding a potential function


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



When they say therefore g is a function of z alone, I don't understand why.

Also when they integrate the second to the last equation with respect to y, I just want to make sure that the y's in bold cancel, that they're really there in the actual answer

1/y * xzy + e^x cos y
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Leading 3-D printer firms to merge in $403M deal (Update)
>> LA to give every student an iPad; $30M order
>> CIA faulted for choosing Amazon over IBM on cloud contract
May30-12, 02:01 AM   #2
 
Mentor
Quote by robertjford80 View Post
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



When they say therefore g is a function of z alone, I don't understand why
It says:
"We write the constant of integration as a function of y and z because its value may change if y and z change."
Then they take ∂f/∂y and find that ∂g/∂y =0 . That means that in this case, g does not change if y changes.

Therefore, g is not a function of y.

Taking ∂f/∂z will give you g as a function of z, if indeed it is a function of z. So I suppose that technically, until you do this step, you can't say that g is actually a function of z. Added in Edit: Well, at this point they've changed the name of g(y,z) to h(z) .
May30-12, 02:06 AM   #3
 
Quote by robertjford80 View Post
... Also when they integrate the second to the last equation with respect to y...
They never integrated with respect to y.
May30-12, 02:06 AM   #4
 

finding a potential function


Quote by SammyS View Post

Therefore, g is not a function of y.
As far as I can tell I don't even see what dg/dy refers to, so I can't tell if it is zero or something else. How do you know dg/dy = 0

I can type greek letters with this computer, even when I click on the quick symbols.
May30-12, 02:07 AM   #5
 
Quote by algebrat View Post
They never integrated with respect to y.

Why not? Were they supposed to?
May30-12, 02:23 AM   #6
 
Mentor
Quote by robertjford80 View Post
As far as I can tell I don't even see what dg/dy refers to, so I can't tell if it is zero or something else. How do you know dg/dy = 0

I can type greek letters with this computer, even when I click on the quick symbols.
The equation
[itex]\displaystyle -e^x\sin(y)+xz+\frac{\partial g}{\partial y}=xz-e^x\sin(y)[/itex]
should tell you that ∂g/∂y =0 .
May30-12, 02:26 AM   #7
 
Quote by robertjford80 View Post

Do you agree that [itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}=xz-e^x\sin y[/itex]?

Do you agree that [itex]f(x,y,z)=e^x\cos y+xyz+g(y,z)[/itex]?

Please take the partial of [itex]f[/itex] with respect to [itex]y[/itex] using the last equation.

Relate the two equations to conclude that [itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial y}g(y,z)=0[/itex].

Let us know if this does not clear things up.

(Is it necessary to integrate in [itex]y[/itex] to solve the problem?)
May30-12, 02:39 AM   #8
 
Quote by SammyS View Post
The equation
[itex]\displaystyle -e^x\sin(y)+xz+\frac{\partial g}{\partial y}=xz-e^x\sin(y)[/itex]
should tell you that ∂g/∂y =0 .
As far as I can tell dg/dy will always be zero because there is no g anywhere in the problem because the problem starts out with x y z. I don't get what's going on with dg
May30-12, 02:43 AM   #9
 
Quote by robertjford80 View Post
As far as I can tell dg/dy will always be zero because there is no g anywhere in the problem because the problem starts out with x y z. I don't get what's going on with dg
I will try to suggest where [itex]g(y,z)[/itex] came from.

Do you agree that [itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=e^x\cos y+yz[/itex]?

If so, use integration to find [itex]f(x,y,z)[/itex].
May30-12, 02:49 AM   #10
 
[QUOTE=algebrat;3934170]Do you agree that [itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}=xz-e^x\sin y[/itex]?

Do you agree that [itex]f(x,y,z)=e^x\cos y+xyz+g(y,z)[/itex]?
[quote]
yes

Please take the partial of [itex]f[/itex] with respect to [itex]y[/itex] using the last equation.
xz - e^x sin y

Relate the two equations to conclude that [itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial y}g(y,z)=0[/itex].
Yea, but I can't imagine any situation where the partial of f with respect to g would not be zero since the function always starts out with variables x y z

Let us know if this does not clear things up.
Not really. I'm going to post another thread re similar issue.
May30-12, 02:49 AM   #11
 
I'm not sure why you think the variables x,y,z imply that g has some properties.
May30-12, 02:50 AM   #12
 
Quote by algebrat View Post
I will try to suggest where [itex]g(y,z)[/itex] came from.

Do you agree that [itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=e^x\cos y+yz[/itex]?

If so, use integration to find [itex]f(x,y,z)[/itex].
Well, why g? And is there any circumstance when the partial of g with respect to y would not be zero?
May30-12, 02:54 AM   #13
 
Quote by robertjford80 View Post
Well, why g? And is there any circumstance when the partial of g with respect to y would not be zero?
We have g because something is missing, and we call it g. Yes, it's partial is not always zero.
May30-12, 02:58 AM   #14
 
Have you found f yet? Also, try ingtegrating N and P in y and z respectively. That may shed some light on what's going on.
May30-12, 03:09 AM   #15
 
Mentor
Quote by robertjford80 View Post
As far as I can tell dg/dy will always be zero because there is no g anywhere in the problem because the problem starts out with x y z. I don't get what's going on with dg
OK, Now I think we see where you are having difficulty is understanding.

The textbook solution points-out why there is a g(y.z) --- It's the "constant" of integration, but it's only constant in regards to x, not y or z, because your integration is W.R.T. x, treating y and z as if they were constants.
May30-12, 03:20 AM   #16
 
I've given up on this problem. The book only had about 7 problems on these, and I understood about 5 of them, so that's enough to move on.
May30-12, 09:37 PM   #17
 
Mentor
Quote by robertjford80 View Post
I've given up on this problem. The book only had about 7 problems on these, and I understood about 5 of them, so that's enough to move on.
Let's try the method you used in your more recent thread:
finding a potential function pt 2


You had the partials of f(x,y,z) W.R.T. the variables, from the vector field components.

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=e^x\cos(y)+yz
\quad\to\quad
f(x,\,y,\,z)=e^x\cos(y)+xyz+\text{Some term not containing }x\text{ but including the constant, }C[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}=xz-e^x\sin(y)
\quad\to\quad
f(x,\,y,\,z)=xyz+e^x\cos(y)+\text{Some term not containing }y\text{ but including the constant, }C[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}=xy+z
\quad\to\quad
f(x,\,y,\,z)=xyz+\frac{z^2}{2}+\text{Some term not containing }z\text{ but including the constant, }C[/itex]

So by inspection we have that [itex]\displaystyle f(x,\,y,\,z)=e^x\cos(y)+xyz+\frac{z^2}{2}+C\ .[/itex]

I hope that makes more sense to you!
New Reply

Similar discussions for: finding a potential function
Thread Forum Replies
Finding Potential Function Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Finding the potential energy function( I don't know how the answer came to be) Introductory Physics Homework 1
Finding potential function?? Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Finding potential for a given wave function Advanced Physics Homework 2
Finding the work function using stop potential Introductory Physics Homework 3