Learn Physics w/ Feynman: Is it Still Current?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mayo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Feynman
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relevance and accuracy of Feynman's physics texts in the context of modern physics. Participants explore whether the content of these texts has been disproven or remains valid, considering the evolution of physics theories over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about learning from Feynman's texts due to potential outdated information that may need to be unlearned.
  • Another participant argues that while Feynman's books may be considered out of date, nothing within them has been disproven, noting that older theories have been limited to specific energy ranges without being invalidated.
  • A similar viewpoint is reiterated, emphasizing that Feynman's elementary physics content is timeless and does not delve into advanced topics that might change rapidly, thus ensuring its continued relevance.
  • A participant humorously suggests that Feynman's approach to teaching basic concepts has contributed to the longevity of his work, as it avoids more volatile areas of modern physics.
  • One participant indicates a willingness to return for further discussion after engaging with Feynman's texts, suggesting an ongoing interest in expanding their understanding of physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Feynman's texts have not been disproven and contain timeless principles, though there is acknowledgment that they may be considered outdated in some respects. The discussion reflects a mix of agreement on the validity of the content and uncertainty regarding its current applicability in the face of evolving physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion is limited by the absence of specific examples of content that may be outdated or disproven, as well as the reliance on interpretations of the evolution of physics theories since the early 20th century.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in foundational physics concepts, students considering Feynman's texts for learning, and those curious about the historical context of physics education may find this discussion relevant.

mayo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm interested in learning the fundamentals of physics, likely from Feynman's text. However, I'd like to know if there's anything in the Feynman that's been disproved since it was published as I'd hate to have to unlearn anything I didn't have to. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Feymann's books may be out of date, but I don't think anything in them has been found false. The trend in physics since around 1923 has been positive; older theories have been relegated to limited energy ranges but they haven't been disproven within those ranges. The basic stuff in Feynmann's elementary physics texts is timeless.
 
selfAdjoint said:
Feymann's books may be out of date, but I don't think anything in them has been found false. The trend in physics since around 1923 has been positive; older theories have been relegated to limited energy ranges but they haven't been disproven within those ranges. The basic stuff in Feynmann's elementary physics texts is timeless.

Let's extend that to December 14th,1900. :wink:

Well,the reason for which Feynman's book (as u may have known it is an improved version of a course on General Physics he used to teach for several years) is still valid and will be for a lotta time from now on is that the facts exposed there are NOT ADVANCED.He never mentions (aspects,results from) QFT and the QM chapter is taught at elementary level...
Yes,by not teaching things that had (at that time) the chance of suffering rapid & dramatic changes,Feynman assured immortality for his book.

PRICELESS! :cool:

Daniel.
 
:smile: All right, thanks a bunch, dextercioby and selfAdjoint. I'm sure I'll be back once I finish this puppy to ask about the next step/area I can learn about. Possibly, I will be back before then for clarification.
 

Similar threads

Intro Physics Feynman Lectures on Physics Tape Recordings Online for Free Listening
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Complementary resources to Feynman Lectures
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
Classical FLP Original Course Handouts at The Feynman Lectures Website
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Intro Physics Looking for beginner to advanced physics textbooks
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Intro Physics Several Physics Books to Choose From (Wolfson, Knight, Feynman)
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Solid State A guide to Feynman diagrams in the many-body problem
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Classical The Feynman Lectures for a newcomer
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
LaTeX LaTeX formatting Feynman Diagrams incorrectly
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Astrophysics Book Around the Subjects of Supernovae and Stellar Remenants
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Solid State Textbook for Computational Solid-State Physics?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K