Register to reply

Poisson brackets and angular momentum

by Rhi
Tags: angular, brackets, momentum, poisson
Share this thread:
Rhi
#1
Aug24-12, 08:31 AM
P: 10
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Let f(q, p), g(q, p) and h(q, p) be three functions in phase space. Let Lk =
εlmkqlpm be the kth component of the angular momentum.
(i) Define the Poisson bracket [f, g].
(ii) Show [fg, h] = f[g, h] + [f, h]g.
(iii) Find [qj , Lk], expressing your answer in terms of the permutation symbol.
(iv) Show [Lj , Lk] = qjpk−qkpj . Show also that the RHS satisfies qjpk−qkpj =
εijkLi. Deduce [Li, |L|2] = 0.
[Hint: the identity εijkεklm = δilδjm − δimδjl may be useful in (iv)]



2. Relevant equations n/a

3. The attempt at a solution


i) [f,g]=[itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial q_i}\frac{\partial g}{\partial p_i}\frac{\partial f}{\partial p_i}\frac{\partial g}{\partial q_i}[/itex]

ii) easy to show from the definition in i)

iii) after a bit of working, I get εlmkql

iv) my working is quite long, but I get [Lj,Lk]=qjpk-qkpjijkLi as required.

The bit I'm having trouble with is the very last bit of the question, to deduce [Li, |L|2] = 0.

Since it's only a small part of the question, it seems as though this part should be fairly simple so maybe I'm overlooking something, but I don't get 0. This is my working:

[Li, |L|2]=[Li, LjLj]=Lj[Li, Lj]+[Li, Lj]Lj=2Lj[Li, Lj]

I'm not entirely sure where to go from here so any help (or pointing out of any glaring errors) would be great.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Bees able to spot which flowers offer best rewards before landing
Classic Lewis Carroll character inspires new ecological model
When cooperation counts: Researchers find sperm benefit from grouping together in mice
conquest
#2
Aug24-12, 05:26 PM
P: 117
I don't really see how in the last line you get to 2L_j[L_i,L_j] if this commutator contains a L_k and the L_subscripts don't commute.
Rhi
#3
Aug25-12, 03:38 AM
P: 10
I'm not really sure what you mean, there's no L_k involved in the last line? And I'm not really sure what you mean by a commutator, either..

conquest
#4
Aug25-12, 09:39 AM
P: 117
Poisson brackets and angular momentum

Haha I was being infinitely stupid. I forgot you were talking about Poisson brackets. I have a lame excuse for it though namely that I usually use { , } for poisson and [ , ] for commutator. Now to redeem myself I will actually look at this last exercise. be back shortly!
conquest
#5
Aug25-12, 09:53 AM
P: 117
So here it goes. Leave the last equality out and when you get

[itex] L_j[L_i,L_j]+[L_i,L_j]L_j = L_j\epsilon_{kij} L_k + \epsilon_{kij} L_kL_j = \epsilon_{kij}L_jL_k - \epsilon_{jik} L_kL_j = \epsilon_{kij}L_jL_k - \epsilon_{kij} L_jL_k = 0 [/itex]

Where in the equality before last I just relabel j to k and vice versa in the second summand.
Rhi
#6
Aug25-12, 10:33 AM
P: 10
Ah, I get it. That makes a lot of sense, cheers :)


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Poisson's Brackets Classical Physics 0
Poisson Brackets Advanced Physics Homework 7
Poisson Brackets Advanced Physics Homework 0
Poisson brackets Advanced Physics Homework 0
Poisson Brackets Advanced Physics Homework 0