Dynamic Equations of the ADM Formalism

  • Thread starter TerryW
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Dynamic
In summary, the ADM formalism is a mathematical framework for describing the evolution of a spacetime in the theory of general relativity. It includes dynamic equations, which govern the evolution of the geometry of a spacetime, and is significant in general relativity because it allows for the decomposition of spacetime into spatial hypersurfaces and a time coordinate. The dynamic equations of the ADM formalism are a subset of the Einstein field equations and have applications in numerical relativity, gravitational waves, and cosmology.
  • #1
TerryW
Gold Member
191
13
Homework Statement
I have been trying to find my way to reproducing MTW's equation 21.115. I've identified a couple of errors in my earlier postings on this and I've worked on these to get me closer to the answer but I'm still not quite there.
Relevant Equations
MTW's equation 21.115
The main error in my earlier work was forgetting that to obtain ##\delta X## you have to find not only ##\frac {\partial X}{\partial g_{ij}}##, but also ##\big(-\frac {\partial X}{\partial g_{ij,k}}\big)_{,k}## and ##\big(\frac {\partial X}{\partial g_{ij,kl}}\big)_{,kl}##. I also missed a trick when I worked on ##\delta (N\gamma^\frac{1}{2}R)##.

So the results of my reworking are as follows (There are many pages of work producing the results for ##\big(\frac {\partial (-N\mathcal{H})}{\partial g_{ij}}\big)## ,##\big(-\frac {\partial (-N\mathcal{H})}{\partial g_{ij,k}}\big)_{,k}## , ##\big(\frac {\partial (-N\mathcal{H})}{\partial g_{ij,kl}}\big)_{,kl}## and ##\big(\frac {\partial (-N_i\mathcal{H}^i)}{\partial g_{ij}}\big)## ,##\big(-\frac {\partial (-N_i\mathcal{H}^i)}{\partial g_{ij,kl}}\big)_{,kl}## , ##\big(\frac {\partial (-N_i\mathcal{H}^i)}{\partial g_{ij,kl}}\big)_{,kl}##) I'm happy to share these if anyone is interested!

The results for ##\delta (-N\mathcal{H})## are:

A. ##\delta (N\gamma^\frac{1}{2}R) = -N(\gamma^\frac{1}{2})(R^{ij} - \frac{1}{2}g^{ij}R)##

(The Palatini method is a short cut to this result - saves a lot of work)

(i) ##\frac {\partial }{\partial g_{ij}}(-N\gamma^\frac{1}{2}(Tr\pi^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr\pi)^2))## produces:

B. ## \frac{1}{2}g^{ij}(-N\gamma^\frac{1}{2}(Tr\pi^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr\pi)^2))## and

C. ##-2N\gamma^\frac{1}{2}(Tr|pi^2 - \frac{1}{2}(\pi^{im}\pi_m{}^j - \frac{1}{2}\pi^{ij}Tr\pi)##

(ii) ##\big(-\frac {\partial }{\partial g_{ij,k}}(-N\gamma^\frac{1}{2}(Tr\pi^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr\pi)^2))\big)_{,k}## produces:

##(-2N^i\pi^{jk} +N^k\pi^{ij})_{,k}##

This can then be turned into:

E. ##(-2N^i\pi^{jk})_{|k}## which is unwanted plus
more unwanted terms ##+2N^m\Gamma^i{}_{mk}\pi^{jk} +2N^i\Gamma^j{}_{mk}\pi^{mk} +2N^i\Gamma^k{}_{mk}\pi^{mj} ## plus

F. ##(N^k\pi^{ij}))_{|k}## which we do want plus
more unwanted terms ## - N^m\Gamma^i{}_{mk}\pi^{ij} - N^k\Gamma^j{}_{mk}\pi^{im} - N^k\Gamma^k{}_{mk}\pi^{mj} ##

##-N\mathcal{H}## contains no terms in ##g_{ij,kl}##

The results for ##\delta (-N_i\mathcal{H^i})## are:

(i) ##\frac {\partial (-N_i\mathcal{H}^i)}{\partial g_{ij}}## gives:

D. ##-N^j_{|k}\pi^{ik} - N^i_{|k}\pi^{jk}## plus

-E. ##(2N^i\pi^{jk})_{|k}## which cancels E. above plus an unwanted term ##g^{ij}N_l(\pi^{lk})_{|k}##

(ii) ##\big(-\frac {\partial (-N_i\mathcal{H}^i)}{\partial g_{ij,k}}\big)_{,k}## , gives

G. ##(-4N_{|m}\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}(g^{il}g^{jk} - g^{ij}g^{kl})_{,k}##and a whole raft of unwanted terms

(iii) ##\big(\frac {\partial (-N_i\mathcal{H}^i)}{\partial g_{ij,kl}}\big)_{,kl}## gives

H. ##(-2N\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}(g^{il}g^{jk} - g^{ij}g^{kl})_{,kl}##

I can work on G and H to produce a term like ## \gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}(N^{ij} - g^{ij}N^{|m}{}_{|m})## but it has an unwanted factor of '6' in it plus another load of unwanted terms.

In summary, I have been able to produce all the terms in MTW 21.115 without the need to mine into the divergence, but I am left with a rogue factor 6 and a whole load of unwanted bits and pieces which do not appear to cancel out in any way.

If there is anyone out there who would be willing to check through any of my workings to help identify where I am going wrong, it would be much appreciated.RegardsTerryW
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Dear TerryW,

Thank you for sharing your results and asking for feedback. From your description, it seems like you have put a lot of effort into reworking your previous work and have made some progress. However, there are a few points that I would like to address in order to help identify where you may have gone wrong.

Firstly, it is important to remember that in order to obtain ##\delta X##, you need to find not only ##\frac {\partial X}{\partial g_{ij}}##, but also ##\big(-\frac {\partial X}{\partial g_{ij,k}}\big)_{,k}## and ##\big(\frac {\partial X}{\partial g_{ij,kl}}\big)_{,kl}##. It seems like you have correctly identified this as the main error in your earlier work.

Secondly, I would suggest double checking your calculations for the terms ##\big(-\frac {\partial }{\partial g_{ij,k}}(-N\gamma^\frac{1}{2}(Tr\pi^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr\pi)^2))\big)_{,k}## and ##\big(\frac {\partial }{\partial g_{ij,kl}}(-N\gamma^\frac{1}{2}(Tr\pi^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr\pi)^2))\big)_{,kl}##. It seems like you have encountered some unwanted terms, and it is possible that these could be the result of a mistake in your calculations.

Thirdly, it is important to note that the Palatini method is a shortcut and may not always give you the most accurate results. It is possible that the factor of 6 that you are encountering is a result of using this method. I would suggest revisiting your calculations using a more rigorous approach to see if this factor can be eliminated.

Lastly, it may be helpful to have a colleague or another scientist review your work and provide feedback. Sometimes, a fresh set of eyes can help identify mistakes or offer new insights. I hope this helps and I wish you the best of luck in resolving any remaining issues with your work.
 

1. What is the ADM formalism?

The ADM formalism, also known as the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner formalism, is a mathematical framework used to describe the dynamics of space-time in general relativity. It decomposes space-time into space and time, allowing for a more intuitive understanding of the equations.

2. What are the dynamic equations of the ADM formalism?

The dynamic equations of the ADM formalism are the Hamiltonian and momentum constraints, which are used to describe the evolution of space-time. These equations are derived from the Einstein field equations and describe the relationship between the geometry of space-time and the matter and energy within it.

3. How are the dynamic equations of the ADM formalism solved?

The dynamic equations of the ADM formalism are typically solved using numerical methods, such as finite difference or finite element methods. These methods involve discretizing space-time into a grid and solving the equations at each point on the grid to simulate the evolution of space-time over time.

4. What are the applications of the ADM formalism?

The ADM formalism is primarily used in the field of general relativity to study the dynamics of space-time. It has also been applied in other areas, such as numerical relativity, where it is used to simulate the behavior of black holes and other extreme gravitational phenomena.

5. Are there any limitations to the ADM formalism?

One limitation of the ADM formalism is that it is only applicable to space-times that are asymptotically flat, meaning they have no curvature at infinity. It also does not take into account the effects of quantum mechanics, so it cannot be used to describe the behavior of space-time at a very small scale.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
296
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
915
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
890
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
959
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
665
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
741
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
1K
Back
Top