| New Reply |
Mean Squared Error vs Loss |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Sep13-12, 06:30 PM | #1 |
|
|
Mean Squared Error vs Loss
Hi Guys,
I am just starting readings on machine learning and came across ways that the error can be used to learn the target function. The way I understand it, Error: [itex] e = f(\vec{x}) - y* [/itex] Loss: [itex] L(\vec{x}) = \frac{( f(\vec{x}) - y* )^2}{2} [/itex] Empirical Risk: [itex] R(f) = \sum_{i=o}^{m} \frac{( f(\vec{x}) - y* )^2}{2m} [/itex] where y* is the desired function, [itex] \vec{x} [/itex] is the sample vector (example) and m is the number of examples in your sample space. I don't understand why the factor of 2 is present in the expression for loss. The only condition my instructor placed on loss was that it had to non-negative, hence the exponent 2. But the division by two only seems to make the loss less than it really is. I also came across the expression for mean squared error, and it is essentially the loss without the factor of 2. If anyone could shed light on why the factor of 2 is there, I would be grateful |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Mean Squared Error vs Loss
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Estimation, bias and mean squared error | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 5 | ||
| Integral of squared error function | Calculus | 17 | ||
| Integral of squared error function | Calculus | 0 | ||
| Question about Mean Squared Error::Why Squared? | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 10 | ||