What are the shear stress components on an arbitrary plane in a 3D stress state?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Xinyue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Plane Stress
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of shear stress components on an arbitrary plane within a three-dimensional stress state. Participants explore the necessary transformations and mathematical formulations required to derive these components, focusing on the complexities involved in 3D stress transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the feasibility of deriving shear stress components in a 3D stress state and seeks guidance on the topic.
  • Another participant suggests that a generalized 3D stress transformation is required, involving direction cosines from three rotations, and notes that while the transformation matrix is lengthy, it is manageable.
  • A later reply confirms the need for a transformation matrix and provides a tensor form for clarity, detailing the components involved in the transformation.
  • Several participants express uncertainty regarding the definitions and calculations of the direction cosines (l, m, n) and their respective components, seeking clarification on their roles in the transformation process.
  • One participant indicates that simplifying the system could make the transformation easier, while another emphasizes the importance of systematically considering rotations about each axis.
  • Participants share links to external resources for further understanding of direction cosines and transformations, highlighting the complexity compared to 2D cases.
  • There is a mention of ongoing difficulties with calculating rotated shear stresses, indicating that some participants are still grappling with the concepts involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the necessity of a 3D stress transformation to derive shear stress components, but there remains uncertainty regarding the specifics of direction cosines and their application. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the best approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the complexity of the 3D transformation may lead to confusion, particularly when compared to simpler 2D cases. There are unresolved questions regarding the exact definitions and calculations of direction cosines, as well as the application of the transformation matrix.

Xinyue
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a question about the 3D stress distribution. I need to know the shear stress components on a arbitrary plane in a cubic under 3d stress state. But it seems not possible to derive them. I haven't found a book about this. Anybody knows something about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Am I understanding it correctly that you'd essentially need a generalized 3D stress transformation, from one coordinate system to another ? Essentially doing the transform using e.g. the 9 resulting direction cosines arising from 3 rotations (naturally depending on how complex is the orientation of your plane compared to the initial state). If so that can sure be done, the transformation matrix is somewhat lengthy but not too 'bad'.
 
thanks

You are right. Thanks.
PerennialII said:
Am I understanding it correctly that you'd essentially need a generalized 3D stress transformation, from one coordinate system to another ? Essentially doing the transform using e.g. the 9 resulting direction cosines arising from 3 rotations (naturally depending on how complex is the orientation of your plane compared to the initial state). If so that can sure be done, the transformation matrix is somewhat lengthy but not too 'bad'.
 
Hi Xinyue, the tensor form is way more compact but this is probably clearer, between the original system and [itex]^'[/itex] system :

[tex] \left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> \sigma_{xx}^'\\<br /> \sigma_{yy}^'\\<br /> \sigma_{zz}^'\\<br /> \sigma_{yz}^'\\<br /> \sigma_{xz}^'\\<br /> \sigma_{xy}^'<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br /> =[T_{\sigma}] <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> \sigma_{xx}\\<br /> \sigma_{yy}\\<br /> \sigma_{zz}\\<br /> \sigma_{yz}\\<br /> \sigma_{xz}\\<br /> \sigma_{xy}<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]

where

[tex] [T_{\sigma}] =<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cccccc}<br /> l_{1}^2 & m_{1}^2 & n_{1}^2 & 2m_{1}n_{1} & 2n_{1}l_{1} & 2l_{1}m_{1}\\<br /> l_{2}^2 & m_{2}^2 & n_{2}^2 & 2m_{2}n_{2} & 2n_{2}l_{2} & 2l_{2}m_{2}\\<br /> l_{3}^2 & m_{3}^2 & n_{3}^2 & 2m_{3}n_{3} & 2n_{3}l_{3} & 2l_{3}m_{3}\\<br /> l_{1}l_{3} & m_{1}m_{3} & n_{1}n_{3} & (m_{1}n_{3}+m_{3}n_{1}) & (l_{1}n_{3}+l_{3}n_{1})& (l_{1}m_{3}+l_{3}m_{1})\\<br /> l_{2}l_{3} & m_{2}m_{3} & n_{2}n_{3} & (m_{2}n_{3}+m_{3}n_{2}) & (l_{2}n_{3}+l_{3}n_{2})& (l_{2}m_{3}+l_{3}m_{2})\\<br /> l_{1}l_{2} & m_{1}m_{2} & n_{1}n_{2} & (m_{1}n_{2}+m_{2}n_{1}) & (l_{1}n_{2}+l_{2}n_{1})& (l_{1}m_{2}+l_{2}m_{1})<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]

where the direction cosines are

[tex]l=cos\alpha[/tex]
[tex]m=cos\beta[/tex]
[tex]n=cos\gamma[/tex]

and [itex]\alpha[/itex] is the angle between [itex]x,x^'[/itex], [itex]\beta[/itex] is the angle between [itex]y,y^'[/itex], [itex]\gamma[/itex] is the angle between [itex]z,z^'[/itex] where you'll get the direction cosine components.
 
Hi I need to rotate stresses as above but I am not sure exactly what L1,L2 and L3 are , same with m1 ect and n1 etc can some one please help
thanks
 
Hi litters95 and welcome to Pf! You're referring to the components of the direction cosines, these might be of use (be careful with the notation, this is a tad more complex than the 2D cases typically presented since it's the "general" 3D transformation):

http://www.electromagnetics.biz/DirectionCosines.htm
http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/docs/reference/CRC-formulas/node52.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direction_cosines

if you need a general form what's in #4 will do, but if you need something which works for example in 2D it can be clarified a whole lot ... what sort of a problem you're working with?
 
Hi
I am trying to rotate 3 d stresses like the matrix above but I am not sure what L1..L3, n1.. N3 and m1 m2 and m3 are .
thanks
 
Ok, so we've the primed and unprimed systems between which the transformation is being made. [itex]l_{i}[/itex] are the direction cosines between the [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]x^{'}[/itex], [itex]y^{'}[/itex], [itex]z^{'}[/itex]. [itex]m[/itex] and [itex]n[/itex] are defined similarly, so you've 9 different direction cosines in a general 3D transformation. It is quite a bit simpler if you can simplify your system a bit, but actually if you do it systematically and consider the rotations with respect to each axis one by one it'll be fairly straightforward ([itex]l=cos(\alpha), m=cos(\beta), n=cos(\gamma)[/itex] if consider a system where the axes are rotated by [itex]\alpha,\beta,\gamma[/itex]).
 
PerennialII said:
Ok, so we've the primed and unprimed systems between which the transformation is being made. [itex]l_{i}[/itex] are the direction cosines between the [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]x^{'}[/itex], [itex]y^{'}[/itex], [itex]z^{'}[/itex]. [itex]m[/itex] and [itex]n[/itex] are defined similarly, so you've 9 different direction cosines in a general 3D transformation. It is quite a bit simpler if you can simplify your system a bit, but actually if you do it systematically and consider the rotations with respect to each axis one by one it'll be fairly straightforward ([itex]l=cos(\alpha), m=cos(\beta), n=cos(\gamma)[/itex] if consider a system where the axes are rotated by [itex]\alpha,\beta,\gamma[/itex]).

thanks again i think I am nearly there just having a few probelms now with the rotated shear stresses
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K