How to Determine the Rate of Change of Total Resistance in Parallel Resistors?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the rate of change of total resistance (Rt) in parallel resistors R1 and R2, where R1 = 80 Ω and R2 = 100 Ω. The rates of change for R1 and R2 are given as dΩ1/dt = 0.3 and dΩ2/dt = 0.2, respectively. The correct approach involves differentiating the total resistance formula Rt = R1R2/(R1 + R2) using the quotient rule. The final expression for the rate of change of total resistance is derived as -1/Rt² * dRt/dt = -1/R1² * dR1/dt - 1/R2² * dR2/dt, which can be solved by substituting the known values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parallel resistor circuits
  • Knowledge of differentiation and calculus
  • Familiarity with the quotient rule in calculus
  • Basic concepts of variable resistances
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the quotient rule in calculus
  • Learn about the behavior of variable resistances in electrical circuits
  • Explore advanced topics in circuit analysis, such as Thevenin's and Norton's theorems
  • Investigate the impact of temperature on resistance values in materials
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in circuit design or analysis will benefit from reading this discussion.

Orion1
Messages
961
Reaction score
3
If two resistors with resistances R1 and R2 are connected in parallel, then the total resistance Rt, measured in ohms, is:
[tex]\frac{1}{R_t} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2}[/tex]

If R1 and R2 are increasing at rates:
[tex]\frac{d \Omega_1}{dt} = 0.3 \; \; \frac{d \Omega_2}{dt} = 0.2 \; \; R_1 = 80 \; \Omega \; \; R_2 = 100 \; \Omega[/tex]

How fast is Rt changing?

[tex]\frac{d \Omega_t}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} \right)^{-1}[/tex]

Is this the correct initial setup to differentiate this problem?

I am uncertain of the initial differential setup, due to the reciprocals...

This was my initial setup, however does not appear any simpler...

Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
well i am assuming that the resistances here are variable resistances (ofcourse otherwise the problem would make little sense, but there was no mention of this in the problem itself).

Anyways,
Rearrange to get Rt as,
Rt = R1R2/(R1+R2)
now differentiate this w.r.t to t.

This now corresponds to ur,
[tex]\frac{d \Omega_t}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} \right)^{-1}[/tex]

Well this should be relatively simple,
first differentiate R1R2/(R1+R2) as D(u/v) form.
That should give,
(vdu - udv)/v^2

Now du is nothing but D(R1R2) which can be differentiated as D(uv) form.
dv is nothing but D(R1+R2) which can be differentiated as D(u+v) form.

The final expression might be a bit "inelegant" but it shouldn't be a problem.

-- AI
 
Here's the elegant way to do it

[tex]-\frac{1}{R_{t}^{2}}\frac{dR_{t}}{dt}=-\frac{1}{R_{1}^{2}}\frac{dR_{1}}{dt}-\frac{1}{R_{2}^{2}}\frac{dR_{2}}{dt}[/tex]

Multiply by [itex]-R_{t}^{2}[/itex] and substitute the numerical values.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
24K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K