Why is it difficult to integrate x^x


by latyph
Tags: difficult, integrate
latyph
latyph is offline
#1
Jun1-05, 08:16 AM
P: 8
I tried doing this but could not,why is it so?
Phys.Org News Partner Mathematics news on Phys.org
Researchers help Boston Marathon organizers plan for 2014 race
'Math detective' analyzes odds for suspicious lottery wins
Pseudo-mathematics and financial charlatanism
dextercioby
dextercioby is offline
#2
Jun1-05, 08:33 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 11,863
It's not difficult.Nobody thought of defining a special function to account for its antiderivative.

Daniel.
Zurtex
Zurtex is offline
#3
Jun1-05, 08:34 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,123
Because it can't be integrated in terms of elementary functions. Most functions are 'not easy' to integrate in this way.

HallsofIvy
HallsofIvy is offline
#4
Jun1-05, 09:26 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,886

Why is it difficult to integrate x^x


Or, to say the same thing that Dextercioby and Zurtex said, in different words, because there is no elementary function whose derivative is xx!
arildno
arildno is offline
#5
Jun1-05, 10:43 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 12,016
A better question would be:
Why is it simple to integrate f(x)=1?
abia ubong
abia ubong is offline
#6
Jun1-05, 11:51 AM
P: 70
i tried doin it ,but always get to a place i cant continue.who can help integrate [(x^x)(1+LOG[X])]^2.All help will be appreciated
arildno
arildno is offline
#7
Jun1-05, 12:29 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 12,016
Quote Quote by abia ubong
i tried doin it ,but always get to a place i cant continue.who can help integrate [(x^x)(1+LOG[X])]^2.All help will be appreciated
You won't get any, since an anti-derivative of x^x is inexpressible in terms of elementary functions.
goldi
goldi is offline
#8
Jun1-05, 12:48 PM
P: 23
when i plugged it into the integrator of mathematica it gave it back as same...i dont know why it did not do computation.
Zurtex
Zurtex is offline
#9
Jun1-05, 01:05 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,123
Quote Quote by goldi
when i plugged it into the integrator of mathematica it gave it back as same...i dont know why it did not do computation.
Because as said many times previously in this thread, it can not be integrated in terms of elementary functions.
goldi
goldi is offline
#10
Jun1-05, 01:11 PM
P: 23
i understand that yeah...but even Mathematica couldn't post the solution in terms of complex functions or whatever high level function it ocntains...
there must be a solution to it....What it is?
Zurtex
Zurtex is offline
#11
Jun1-05, 01:13 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,123
Quote Quote by goldi
i understand that yeah...but even Mathematica couldn't post the solution in terms of complex functions or whatever high level function it ocntains...
there must be a solution to it....What it is?
There are no special functions defined in general mathematics for the integral.

If you want a function that is the anti-derivative of xx then just define one and then you can study its properties.
matt grime
matt grime is offline
#12
Jun1-05, 01:30 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 9,398
There is a solution it is the function F such that dF/dx is x^x. But we can't write it anymore nicely than that, and there is nothing surprising about it. Almost no functions have integrals that we can write out nicely and explicitly in some closed form. How many times must that be said in this thread? Shall we lock it now to stop yet another person having to say it?
goldi
goldi is offline
#13
Jun1-05, 01:56 PM
P: 23
Sorry but i am such a big fool that yours terminology is not clear to me....Last time-Has its integral ever calculated ...or as ppl are saying that it has such a function as integral that has never been defined./so is research going on over this

i have a question......how can we integrate x*Sec(x)
i have tried this question than any other question ever.....
the point is that it was asked in my 12th class and when i plug it into Integrator i could not even understand the solution...
arildno
arildno is offline
#14
Jun1-05, 02:00 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 12,016
Any particular definite integral of x^x can, of course be calculated to an arbitrary degree of accuracy by numerical techniques.
Jameson
Jameson is offline
#15
Jun1-05, 03:16 PM
P: 789
To integrate x*Sec(x) I would use integration by parts, but in this case the tabular method will work nicely.

[tex]\int x\sec{x}dx[/tex]

[tex]\int udv = uv - \int vdu[/tex]

[tex]u = x[/tex]
[tex]dv = \sec{x}dx[/tex]

That should get you started.
dextercioby
dextercioby is offline
#16
Jun1-05, 05:40 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 11,863
I think you meant

[tex] dv=\sec x \ dx [/tex]

I'm not sure though...

Daniel.
Icebreaker
#17
Jun1-05, 06:02 PM
P: n/a
Quote Quote by Zurtex
If you want a function that is the anti-derivative of xx then just define one and then you can study its properties.
Has it been done before? Any interesting properties?
Pyrrhus
Pyrrhus is offline
#18
Jun1-05, 06:46 PM
HW Helper
Pyrrhus's Avatar
P: 2,280
Look for Liouville's Principle about integration in finite terms.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Integrate e^(-r^2) General Math 4
integrate Ln x Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Integrate Introductory Physics Homework 2
Integrate Introductory Physics Homework 2
integrate Introductory Physics Homework 3