How many bounces until the ball reaches a height less than 15cm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ms. confused
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Bouncing ball
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a ball dropped from a height of 3 meters that bounces back to 82% of its previous height. Participants are tasked with determining how many bounces it takes for the ball to reach a height of less than 15 cm.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of geometric series to find the height after each bounce and question how to apply the condition of being "less than 15 cm." There are discussions about trial and error methods, the validity of specific values for height, and the implications of rounding errors in calculations.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations of the problem, with some participants suggesting different approaches to find the number of bounces. A few have provided calculations leading to varying conclusions about the correct number of bounces needed, indicating a productive exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the setup of the problem and the specific requirement of reaching a height less than 15 cm, which leads to discussions about the implications of using inequalities and logarithmic methods for solving the problem.

ms. confused
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
This is a pretty tricky question...been trying to piece it together but I think I need some help.

A ball is dropped from a height of 3 m. After each bounce, it rises to 82% of its previous height. After how many bounces does the ball reach a height less than 15cm?

I get the whole geometric series thing, finding 'n' and all that, but what's with the "less than 15cm"? What do I do in this case? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If initial height = h_i = 3m
Height of nth bounce = h_n = 3*.82^n

You are looking for n such that h_n < 0.15m.
 
Exactly so would I just choose any value <0.15m and use it as h_n in order to find 'n'?
 
That wouldn't work, because the series h_n only holds specific values. I'd just crank out values for h_n for each n, my guess is its about 15.
 
So you mean kind of like a trial and error approach?
 
Height initially = [itex]h[/itex] = 3m
Height after first bounce = [itex](0.82)(h)[/itex]
height after second bounce=[itex](0.82)^2 (h)[/itex]
Height after nth bounce=[itex](0.82)^n(h)[/itex]

Now here you might like to use a bit of 'hitntrial' ...Now you want 'n' such that [itex](0.82)^n(h)[/itex] is just more than .15m
 
Why more if the question specifies that it should be less?
 
That's what I would do, but I'm a lazy ass.
 
It should be less.
 
  • #10
[itex](0.82)^n>0.05[/itex]

[itex] n=15[/itex]
 
  • #11
Brain, that is just confusing, let her solve the problem her own way. Ms. confused,

[tex]h_n = 3(0.84)^n[/tex] and [tex]h_n \leq 0.15[/tex] so then

[tex]3(0.82)^n \leq 0.15[/tex]

You need to solve that for an integer n.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
actually i misread the question .

n=15 gives the exact answer,but for less than 15 cm , n=14
 
  • #13
Okay, I was getting 15 too but according to the answer key, n=16. This is probably a type-o, eh?
 
  • #14
No, 16 is the correct solution.

Brain, the sequence is decreasing, for each higher n, h_n has a lower value. At n = 15 you get

[tex]3*0.82^{15} = 0.1528m[/tex] which is still higher than 0.15m. Therefore you need another (16th) bounce to drop below.
 
  • #15
Thanks for correction.n=16
 
  • #16
Alright now it makes perfect sense. Thank you so much!
 
  • #17
n= 16 because,
log0,05/log0,82=15,... at this value of n, h is 15 cm. on 16th jump, it would get under that height.
 
  • #18
The much easier way to solve the inequality is to use logs.

Let [itex]N[/itex] be the required number of bounces, [itex]h_0[/itex] be initial height in centimeters and [itex]h_n[/itex] be the height after [itex]n[/itex] bounces.

We have : [tex]h_n = (0.82)^nh_0[/tex]

We want : [tex]h_N < 15[/tex]

So [tex](0.82)^Nh_0 < 15[/tex]

Take common logs (base 10) of both sides,

[tex]\log{(0.82)^N} + \log h_0 < \log 15[/tex]

The above inequality holds because log is a monotone increasing function on the positive reals.

[tex]N\log(0.82) < \log 15 - \log h_0[/tex]

Divide throughout by [tex]\log(0.82)[/tex], but remember to invert the sign of the inequality because this is a negative quantity (since 0.82 is less than 10, the base of the logs).

[tex]N > \frac{\log 15 - \log h_0}{\log(0.82)}[/tex]

Evaluate that, substituting [tex]h_0[/tex] = 300,

giving [tex]N > 15.096[/tex] or so.

So the smallest integer value for N that satisifies is [tex]N = 16[/tex].
 
  • #19
I think the poster's problem was the setup, not the solving.
 
  • #20
As you found out on iteration [tex]3*0.82^{15} = 0.1528[/tex]. This is better to use, compared to [tex]3*0.82^{15} = 0.15[/tex]
This is where those rounding errors, I mentioned on an earlier question, come into play.

Doc Brain, I liked your approach to solving this one.
Dr. Brain said:
Height initially = [itex]h[/itex] = 3m
Height after first bounce = [itex](0.82)(h)[/itex]
height after second bounce= [itex](0.82)^2 (h)[/itex]
Height after nth bounce=[itex](0.82)^n(h)[/itex]
Another way to plug-and-chug an interative formula is using spreadsheet. Excel's math utilities handle calculations well.
 
Last edited:
  • #21
Brain's was wrong :confused:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K