First Ionization Energies & Metallic/Non-Metallic Properties

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between first ionization energies and the properties of metallic and non-metallic elements, framed as a homework problem. Participants explore the implications of these properties in the context of chemistry, particularly at a school level.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that nonmetallic atoms generally have higher first ionization energies compared to metallic atoms.
  • It is noted that certain gases, specifically helium, neon, and argon, exhibit very high first ionization energies, with helium being an exception due to its electron configuration.
  • A participant emphasizes the need for clarity in the original question, suggesting that the terms "metallic and non-metallic" imply a solid property rather than focusing solely on individual atoms.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about whether the question requires an explanation for the observed relationship between ionization energies and metallic/non-metallic properties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic relationship between first ionization energies and metallic/non-metallic properties, but there is uncertainty regarding the context and depth of the original question. Multiple interpretations of the question's intent remain, and no consensus is reached on the necessity of explaining the underlying reasons for the observed trends.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the clarity of the original question, as well as the potential for varying interpretations based on the educational level of the participants. There is also an acknowledgment that definitions of ionization energies may differ depending on the context.

97lmn
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
got a homework problem...

What is the relationship between first ionization energies and metallic and non-metallic properties?

no idea what they are talking about here.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The policy here is that we can't help unless you show that you've made some effort. Where is the first place you would think to look ?
 
Astronuc said:
Start here - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/chemical/bondd.html#c2

And as Gokul mentioned, students must display some effort on their own. Then we are more than pleased to assist.

Er... I could be misreading something here, but if we look at the original question:

97lmn said:
got a homework problem...

What is the relationship between first ionization energies and metallic and non-metallic properties?

no idea what they are talking about here.

.. the fact that "metallic and non-metallic" are involved means that this is a SOLID property, not individual atoms. If that is the case, the I'm afraid, astronuc, that the definitions of ionization energies (and electron affinities) have slightly different meanings.

But then again, since this was asked in the Chemistry section...

Again, the problem here is that the original question is very vague in describing the CONTEXT of the problem. This seems to be a very common occurrence when people are seeking help - they seem to assume that we know what they're doing and at what level they are at. Why is that?

Zz.
 
Zz, this is (from my best guess) a school level chemistry homework problem. All that is being asked for is a correlation between the first IE of an isolated atom of an element and the tendency of that element to exist as a metallic solid. And there's only one way to attempt answering this question. And while this answer can be found in the hyperphysics link provided by Astronuc, the explanation/definitions will not help any.

No "why"s and "wherefore"s will be explained by the teacher because that would simply be beyond the scope of such a class, not to say anything about being beyond the ability of the average school teacher. A crude, hand-waving explanation, though, can be given.
 
Last edited:
yes...grade 12 chemistry.

heres what I've come up with :blushing: ...

1. nonmetallic atoms have higher first-ionization energies than metallic atoms.

2. certain gases have very high first ionization energies such as helium, neon, and argon. with the exception of helium, they have two s electrons and six p electrons in their outer most energy level.

anything to add or correct?
 
1. Looks about right. But keep in mind that metals can exist only when you have a large number of atoms. I would call them metallic/non-metallic elements, rather than "atoms".

2. These gases have a special name - they are called Noble Gases or Inert Gases.

As far as the question is concerned you have answered it in #1. I'm not certain, though, if the question also wants to know why this relationship exists. You might want to ask your teacher about that.
 
Last edited:
ok thanks, ill ask.
 

Similar threads

Oxygen dip in ionization energy trend
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Why are metals in aqueous solution basic, and non-metals acidic?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
First ionization energy of group 1 and group 2 elements
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Reactive metal wires in a fuel oxidizer mixture
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
First Ionization energy exceptions
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
How does ionization energy affect reactivity in elements?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
Graduate Higher Ionization Energies Germanium
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
How much electrical energy can be extracted from Iron in a cell?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Why reaction between alkali metals and water exothermic?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Why does C-C have a higher bond energy than B-N in hBN and graphene?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K