Function Composition: Graphing f(g(x)) Without Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of function composition, specifically how to graph f(g(x)) using the provided graphs of f(x) and g(x) without any equations. Participants are exploring the relationship between the two functions and the process of generating a new graph from them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand how to derive the graph of f(g(x)) from the graphs of f(x) and g(x). Questions are raised about the process of looking up values on the graphs instead of computing them directly. There is also consideration of the complexity of the graphs involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the method of using the graphs to find values for the composition, while others express uncertainty about the process. There is a recognition that the task may be challenging, and multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of equations and the potential complexity of the graphs, which may affect the ability to derive a formula for the composition directly.

SD-Ness
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I've been an intermittent poster here for about five years. I've come back for another shot at PF. So for a first thread:

Class is a currently a review of old topics. One of them is 'function composition.' I was doing an assignment today and came upon a question that required one to graph f(g(x)) from two graphs given f(x) and g(x). There were no equations supplied. How might one go about graphing f(g(x))? I am not sure of the relationship here, unfortunately.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SD-Ness said:
Class is a currently a review of old topics. One of them is 'function composition.' I was doing an assignment today and came upon a question that required one to graph f(g(x)) from two graphs given f(x) and g(x). There were no equations supplied. How might one go about graphing f(g(x))? I am not sure of the relationship here, unfortunately.

It sounds like you have two graphs, and have to generate a third one, f(g(x)) from the graphs of f(x) and g(x)?

Well, right now, you have y=g(x) and y=f(x). But you want a graph which is y=f(g(x)). Is this enough to get you started? This sounds like a pain, BTW.

Dot
 
Dorothy Weglend said:
It sounds like you have two graphs, and have to generate a third one, f(g(x)) from the graphs of f(x) and g(x)?

Well, right now, you have y=g(x) and y=f(x). But you want a graph which is y=f(g(x)). Is this enough to get you started? This sounds like a pain, BTW.

Dot
Yes, this is correct. I have two graphs - f(x) and g(x) - and I need to generate the third, f(g(x)).

I know that y=g(x) and y=f(x), but I'm not sure how to generate y=f(g(x)) from that.
 
let x=g(x), to sub into the equation y = f(x)? don't know if its an help. its a strange question.
 
Last edited:
SD-Ness said:
Yes, this is correct. I have two graphs - f(x) and g(x) - and I need to generate the third, f(g(x)).

I know that y=g(x) and y=f(x), but I'm not sure how to generate y=f(g(x)) from that.

The only difference is that you have to look up the values on the graphs, instead of compute them. A = g(x), y = f(A), this is how you would compute a function composition, right? These X's and Y's would be the coord's of the point on the new graph. The intermediate value of A is just used to look up the proper value of the function composition.

I'm assuming here that the graphs are complicated, and it's not possible to recover the functions that generated them. If they are simple, like a straight line or a parabola, then you could recover the functions (or make a good guess) and generate a formula to plot the new graph directly.

Dot

Dot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K