Does it make since if it takes 675 food Calories to lift me up 17 ft?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done to lift a person 17 feet, using the formula for potential energy. The original poster attempts to convert their weight from pounds to kilograms and subsequently calculate the work in Joules, which they then convert to food Calories.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conversion of weight from pounds to kilograms and the implications of using grams instead of kilograms in the calculations. There is also a focus on the conversion of Joules to food Calories.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the original poster's calculations, noting an error in the mass conversion. The original poster acknowledges this feedback and indicates they have arrived at a more reasonable answer.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a preference for using 10 m/s² for gravity instead of the standard 9.8 m/s², reflecting a potential assumption or simplification in the calculations. The discussion also highlights the importance of unit consistency in physics problems.

mcca408
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
does it make since if it takes 675 food Calories to lift me up 17 ft
look below

*IGNORING HORIZONTAL DISTANCE*
i got to figure out how much work is done to get myself up from my class to the cafeteria which is 17 ft in vertical hieght
PE=mgh
my weight is 120 lbs i converted to mass
54.545 Kg which makes 54,545 g

multiply that by gravity 10 (yes i know 9.8 but my teacher is stupid and confusing)

then multiply that by hieght which is 17 ft but its got to be Meters so i did 5.1816

so i get Work = 2,826,303.72 Joules
got to convert that to FOOD Cal and i got around 675
with this conversion
J * (1 cal/4.187J) * (1 Food Cal/1,000cal) = Food Calories

so does that makes since it takes 675 food Calories to lift me up 17 ft
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The standard unit for mass is kilograms. Your answer is 1000 times too big because you converted kilograms to grams.
 
mass is in kilograms
 
thanks now i got a more resonable answer
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K