Sodium Channels in refractory period

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter garytse86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Period Sodium
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanisms underlying the refractory period of neurons, specifically focusing on sodium channels and their behavior during and after an action potential. Participants explore the physiological and biochemical processes involved, including ion gradients and channel dynamics, within the context of neurophysiology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that during the absolute refractory period, sodium channels cannot open immediately after closing, which prevents a second action potential from being generated.
  • Others explain that the refractory period is a result of the need to re-establish ion gradients across the membrane, which takes time after an action potential.
  • A participant questions the necessity of ion depletion for sodium channels to reopen, suggesting that sufficient ions remain in the cell for multiple depolarizations.
  • Another participant counters this by emphasizing that the local ion environment around the channels is critical, and that the disruption of ion gradients in that area requires time and energy to restore.
  • Some participants discuss the role of atomic forces in limiting ion flow, suggesting that even with high external sodium concentration, attraction and repulsion forces can inhibit ion entry into the cell.
  • A participant provides an analogy comparing the refractory period to a toilet tank needing to refill before it can be flushed again, to illustrate the concept of re-establishing conditions for action potential generation.
  • Animations are shared to visually represent the action potential and the dynamics of ion movement, contributing to the discussion of these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the refractory period is primarily due to the inability of sodium channels to reopen or the disruption of local ion concentrations. There is no consensus on the exact mechanisms involved, and multiple competing perspectives remain present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of localized ion environments and the role of ion transporters in re-establishing gradients, but the discussion does not resolve the complexities of these interactions or the specific conditions required for sodium channel reopening.

garytse86
Messages
311
Reaction score
0
After an action potential has passed the localised region enters its refractory period, and during the absolute refractory period a second impulse cannot be conducted regardless of the size of the stimulation. This is because the sodium channels cannot open immediately after closing, why is that?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I asked this before:
DocToxyn said:
The absolute refractory period is considered to be a time during which no stimulus, no matter how great, can cause an action potential to be generated. This occurs after each nerve depolarization/action potential generation process. The way it accomplishes the depolarization is via the influx of sodium ions across the cell membrane facilitated by ion channels specific to sodium. As the action potential travels down the axon, channels are opened in a wave-like fashion to facilitate the conduction or movement of the signal from the cell body to the nerve terminal. Since these action potential are driven by ion gradients across the membrane, the cell must re-establish those gradients to repeat the process. This repositioning of ions, again accomplished by channels takes time and therefore accounts for the period during which further signals cannot be sent. A crude, but familiar, example of this might be flushing the toilet. You can only do it once and then must wait for the tank to refill (and regain the potential of the stored water) before it can be done again. This period is followed by the relative refractory period during which only a stronger than normal stimulation can elicit an action potential.
You mentioned the resting state must be re-established before another wave of depolarisation can occur, but there are sufficient ions in cells present for the nerve to be depolarised many times before the supply of ions runs out. Therefore, there is no reason why sodium channels should not be able to open due to that reason.
 
garytse86 said:
After an action potential has passed the localised region enters its refractory period, and during the absolute refractory period a second impulse cannot be conducted regardless of the size of the stimulation. This is because the sodium channels cannot open immediately after closing, why is that?
I *think* it's because the gradient has been disrupted by the last impulse. No?
 
garytse86 said:
I asked this before:

You mentioned the resting state must be re-established before another wave of depolarisation can occur, but there are sufficient ions in cells present for the nerve to be depolarised many times before the supply of ions runs out. Therefore, there is no reason why sodium channels should not be able to open due to that reason.
Consider the ion concentration outside the cell as well?
 
but there are sufficient ions in cells present for the nerve to be depolarised many times before the supply of ions runs out.

Not really, there is few ions that are mobile. They are the fuel and ions channels are a kind of engines that work with ions.

I made an animation of a traveling action potential (without ions channels)
The refractory period exists when all ions are inside (there is another one when all ions are outside or crossing the membrane). Concentration is not playing a role since attraction and repulsion limit incoming/outgoing ions.
http://www.somasimple.com/flash_anims/atomic14.swf
 
ps: red positive ions = sodium ad blue ones = potassium :redface:
 
garytse86 said:
I asked this before:

You mentioned the resting state must be re-established before another wave of depolarisation can occur, but there are sufficient ions in cells present for the nerve to be depolarised many times before the supply of ions runs out. Therefore, there is no reason why sodium channels should not be able to open due to that reason.

You are correct that in the cell as a whole there are enough ions, but these events happen in very localized environments surrounding those channels. As pattylou points out, the ion gradient in that specific area has been disrupted, both inside and outside, therefore you need time and energy to allow structures like Na/K transporters to re-establish the proper distribution of ions.
 
So am I correct in saying that the absolute refractory period is due to the lack of ions in the localised environments not because of the inability of the protein channels to open immediately after they are closed?
 
You're correct and the traditional electrical theory forgets the atomic forces that stop the incoming/outgoing flows. You may have a high Na concentration outside but ions can't get inside if there is already the maximum allowed by attraction/repulsion interactions.

It is why there is a plateau when you change the gradient outside (increasing).
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Here is a tranversal view of the action potential.
http://www.somasimple.com/flash_anims/atomic11.swf
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K