Dynamic application of torque with center of mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a uniform meter stick with a half-filled can of fruit juice attached, requiring the determination of the masses of both the meter stick and the can based on their balance point and the total weight measured. The subject area includes concepts of torque, center of mass, and equilibrium in mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the balance of torques around the axis of rotation and the implications of forces acting on the system. Questions arise about the distances from the axis of rotation to the center of mass of the meter stick and the can, as well as the correct application of gravitational force in calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different interpretations of the forces and torques involved. Some have suggested relationships between the forces acting on the meter stick and the can, while others are clarifying the correct use of gravitational force in determining mass. There is no explicit consensus on the final answers, but productive dialogue is ongoing.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on not confusing gravitational force with acceleration, as the system is in equilibrium. Participants are also navigating the implications of the balance point and the distribution of mass along the meter stick.

SoccaCrazy24
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
ok here is the problem

<br>A uniform meter stick of mass M has a half-filled can of fruit juice of mass m attached to one end. The meter stick and the can balance at a point 33.0 cm from the end of the stick where the can is attached. When the balanced stick-can system is suspended from a scale, the reading on the scale is 2.70 N.
<br>(a) Find the mass of the meter stick.
<br>(b) Find the mass of the can of juice.

Well I am pretty sure that the side with the can on it... will be of greater mass than the other side...

And I also know that the sum of the torques should equal zero, right?

Well i can find the "mass" at the center of mass to be... m = F/a m=2.70/9.81 = .259 kg

what I did at first was divide the mass in half and tried to set the meter stick in portions and add the totals assuming the portions were equal in mass around, but somebody told me that was wrong... I am somewhat lost... please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the sum of torques AROUND THE AXIS OF ROTATION
(the point of suspension) is zero.
How far from the suspension point is the center-of-mass of the meter-stick?
How far is the can?

By the way, the Force by gravity on a mass is F = m g ...
this setup has acceleration = 0 , so you'd better NOT divide by a !
 
well the center of mass of the meter-stick is 17.0 cm to the left of the AXIS OF ROTATION... and the can is 33.0 cm to the right of the AXIS OF ROTATION... and torque = r * F... so then the sum of torques = 0 = (r1*F1 +r2*F2) right? so... 0 = .17*F1 + .33*F2 ... but i know the Force at the AXIS OF ROTATION is 2.70 N but where would I use that?
 
one of those x-coordinates has to be negative, usually the one on the left.

so m1 is twice as heavy as m2.

you know that F1 + F2 = - 2.7 N
 
so assuming F1=(2)F2 then F1=1.8 N and F2=.9N so... then would i be able to use gravity (a=9.81 m/s2) to figure out the mass or no? if so.. the answer would be... m1 (meter-stick)=.1835 and m2 (can)=.09174 is this right?
 
You calculated, NOT assumed, that F1 = 33/17 F2 .
so, it's not exactly a factor of 2 ... so re-do with 33 (not 34) /17.

(again, gravity is a field with units [N/kg] ; nothing accelerates here!)
 
well... F1 = 1.94 (F2) so... FTotal= 2.70N = [1.94(F2) + F2] = 2.94(F2)
F2=.918N and F1= 1.782N
the answer wants it in kg... so how would I transform this into kg if I cannot divide by gravity?
 
You DO divide by gravity ... dividing by g[N/kg] leaves [kg]

what you do NOT do is divide by an acceleration (a) ,
since the acceleration in this case is = 0.
gravity is "g" , NOT "a" ! Do NOT confuse cause (g) with effect (acceleration)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K