Recent content by clacker

  1. C

    Is it Possible to Measure Q or P Without Determining x1 and x2 or p1 and p2?

    so you're saying that if I measure x1 and x2 that put's me into an eigenstate of Q. What about the fact that Q and P commute. If I now measure P haven't I got x1,x2,p1,p2 and now know each particles position and momentum with certainty thus violating the uncertainty principle.
  2. C

    Is it Possible to Measure Q or P Without Determining x1 and x2 or p1 and p2?

    My question is not the measuring of P and Q together, but how do you measure just Q say. If you measure each particles position seperately then subtract I don't think you are actually in an eigenstate of Q but rather in 2 separate 1 particle eigenstates.
  3. C

    Is it Possible to Measure Q or P Without Determining x1 and x2 or p1 and p2?

    Question about measuring observables. If have 2 particle system the particle seperation Q=x1-x2 and total momentum P=p1+p2 are observables of the system as a whole and are commuting. How do you measure these observables. It would seem the only way to measure the separation is to measure the...
  4. C

    Momentum eigenstates particle in box

    Quantum mechanics says measurement of observable always produces result that is one of eigenvalues of that observable. Subsequent measurement yields same value. For a particle in a box with infinite potential barriers if measure momentum doesn't that put system in eigenstate of momentum insuring...
Back
Top