gentzen's latest activity
-
gentzen replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.Wow, I had read Ballentine's orthodoxity measure as 0.88, but actually it is -0.88. Which makes total sense to me.
-
gentzen replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.The "we ignore" part is certainly true. The reasoning why it gets ignored is probably not so much that it is the same as QM, but that...
-
gentzen reacted to Peter Morgan's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with
Like.
tl;dr summary: We will not here consider quantum field theory whatsoever. I suppose that's part of what orthodoxy requires: we can... -
gentzen replied to the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement?.bhobba first brought up that paper in 2021. What WernerQH refers too was probably in August 2025. He also brought it up on other...
-
gentzen reacted to PeroK's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
If I understand what you're saying, that sounds like the complement of @Demystifier argument. We start with a macroscopic system that...
-
gentzen reacted to A. Neumaier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
Yes. The evolution of the radiated system in a homogeneous medium is generally assumed to be unitary, with an effective dynamics...
-
gentzen reacted to pines-demon's post in the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? with Like.
Here is a usual scheme for entanglement There are two entangled particles. Alice receives one of the particles, Bob receives the other...
-
gentzen reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with
Informative.
You can--by creating an environment where the quantum states of the decay products are already occupied, or partially occupied. (And for... -
gentzen reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
If you agree that isolated atom evolves deterministically, then non-determinism must be associated with interaction with the...
-
I’m in the hospital. Had appendectomy last night. Can’t respond properly now. Update: I'm home now and I see the post does not require...
-
gentzen reacted to Morbert's post in the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons with Like.
As an aside: When we write Bell states like $$\ket{\psi} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\ket{\uparrow}_1\ket{\downarrow}_2 +...
-
gentzen reacted to pines-demon's post in the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons with Like.
I thought that was clear, I did not wait until you found out, more like I was discussing without knowing that you got something off (I...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.I had misinterpreted what you wanted to do with your ##S_x## and ##S_p##: Your intention was to use them like the spin measurement...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.This again tell me more about your image from me, than about where I might have misinterpreted you, where I might have lost you, or...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment?.It depends on how you interpret it in detail. If you have one qubit per photon, like the polarization, then it is certainly true. If you...
