Recent content by GIM
-
Undergrad QCD scale and massless limit of u & d quarks
Thank you, @vanhees71. What kind is the scale ##4\pi {f_\pi }##? Now, you changed my question into the relation between quark masses and pion decay constant. Then, again, what reasoning makes me ignore the masses? (For example, when I learned the pion decay, my professor used the formula...- GIM
- Post #6
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
Undergrad QCD scale and massless limit of u & d quarks
Thank you, @RGevo. I just copied the value of ~200MeV from the literature. In many literatures(I've seen), which treat the chiral symmetry, most of them mention the similar statements. Is this really tricky?- GIM
- Post #4
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
Undergrad QCD scale and massless limit of u & d quarks
Hello! Could anybody help me? My wondering seems so trivial, but I can't skip it. They say that since u and d quarks are much lighter than QCD scale(~200MeV), in reality we can consider the QCD Lagrangian has an approximate global chiral symmetry with respect to these two flavors. At first, it...- GIM
- Thread
- Limit Massless Qcd Quarks Scale
- Replies: 5
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
Graduate Good slides or summaries for Field theory, Lie algebra, etc.
This is some kind of master course and I applied for PhD course in theoretical particle physics . If I fail in this interview, then I have to apply to the other university.- GIM
- Post #3
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
Graduate Good slides or summaries for Field theory, Lie algebra, etc.
Hello! I am a diploma student at HEP section. I am going to have an interview for PhD within a week. I've finished the course and learned a lot about Lie algebra, quantum field theory, general relativity, standard model, etc. How can I review everything as soon as possible? For example, Mark...- GIM
- Thread
- Algebra Field Field theory Lie algebra Theory
- Replies: 2
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
Graduate Change of the order of integration including Dirac delta
Thank you, @samalkhaiat! I think this would be the best correct answer, even though I didn't understand it well. I will try to understand it along this direction. Thank you again.- GIM
- Post #35
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Graduate Change of the order of integration including Dirac delta
I am sorry for my ignorance of latex. This was my equation. \begin{equation} \int {{\cal D}A\,{e^{iS\left[ A \right]}}} = \det \left( {\frac{{\delta G\left( {{A^\alpha }} \right)}}{{\delta \alpha }}} \right)\int {{\cal D}\alpha } \int {{\cal D}A\,{e^{iS\left[ A \right]}}\delta \left( {G\left(...- GIM
- Post #21
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Graduate Change of the order of integration including Dirac delta
I am sorry, @andrewkirk. After insertion of the identity, it becomes \[\int {{\cal D}A\,{e^{iS\left[ A \right]}}} = \det \left( {\frac{{\delta G\left( {{A^\alpha }} \right)}}{{\delta \alpha }}} \right)\int {{\cal D}\alpha } \int {{\cal D}A\,{e^{iS\left[ A \right]}}\delta \left( {G\left(...- GIM
- Post #16
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Graduate Change of the order of integration including Dirac delta
Can somebody help me? I am studying Faddeev-Popov trick, following the Peskin and Schroeder's QFT book, but I can't understand one thing. After they inserted the Faddeev-Popov identity, $$I = \int {{\cal D}\alpha \left( x \right)\delta \left( {G\left( {{A^\alpha }} \right)} \right)\det \left(...- GIM
- Thread
- Change Delta Dirac Dirac delta Integration
- Replies: 36
- Forum: Quantum Physics