QCD scale and massless limit of u & d quarks

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the QCD scale and the masses of up (u) and down (d) quarks, particularly in the context of chiral symmetry and its implications for effective models in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Participants explore theoretical aspects, the role of renormalization, and practical approximations in hadronic physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the relationship between the QCD scale and quark masses, suggesting a potential link to renormalization scale.
  • Another participant argues that the renormalization scale is unphysical and may not be significant in this context, emphasizing the non-perturbative nature of QCD effects on light quarks.
  • There is uncertainty regarding the exact scale at which the strong coupling becomes non-perturbative, with suggestions that it is below 1 GeV.
  • Some participants propose that ignoring the masses of u and d quarks is reasonable for practical purposes, while also noting that the strange quark could be treated as massless.
  • Chiral symmetry is discussed as an approximate symmetry of strong interactions, with references to effective hadronic models that utilize this symmetry.
  • One participant raises concerns about the implications of ignoring quark masses in the context of pion decay, questioning the reasoning behind such approximations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of quark masses in relation to the QCD scale and chiral symmetry. While some suggest that approximating u and d quarks as massless is valid, others highlight the complexities and potential issues with this approach, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the relationship between quark masses and the QCD scale, as well as the implications of chiral symmetry in effective models. The discussion also touches on the challenges of non-perturbative QCD effects and the role of the pion decay constant.

GIM
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello!
Could anybody help me?
My wondering seems so trivial, but I can't skip it.
They say that since u and d quarks are much lighter than QCD scale(~200MeV), in reality we can consider the QCD Lagrangian has an approximate global chiral symmetry with respect to these two flavors. At first, it sounded plausible, but now I wonder what relation between the QCD scale and the quark masses there is and how. Is this problem related to the renormalization scale?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

The renormalisation scale is unphysical, but appears as an artefact when we do perturbation theory only to a finite order. So I don't think that's important.

The question is a tricky one, since the light quarks are never free and are in bound hadrons where strong (non-perturbative) qcd effects are ever present... Maybe a lattice person would give a clearer answer.

On the other hand, what is the qcd scale? The value at which the strong coupling becomes non-perturbative. It's not clear to me at which scale this is (below a gev for sure).

For practical purposes, it seems like ignoring the u,d quark masses is reasonable. Even the strange could be considered massless. You can see how good/bad an approximation this is by comparing pion and kaon massed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GIM
Having read the below thread. The quark review on the light quarks which vanhees posted is more informative!
 
Thank you, @RGevo.
I just copied the value of ~200MeV from the literature. In many literatures(I've seen), which treat the chiral symmetry, most of them mention the similar statements. Is this really tricky?
 
It's very tricky. A more pragmatic answer is that you can use chiral symmetry to build effective hadronic models. As it turns out, indeed chiral symmetry is a very good approximate symmetry of the strong interactions since the typical current-light-quark masses are small compared to the scale ##4 \pi f_{\pi} \simeq 1 \; \text{GeV}##, where ##f_{\pi} \simeq 92 \; \mathrm{MeV}## is the pion-decay constant that can be measured through the weak decay of the pions. Note that chiral symmetry is as good a symmetry of the strong interaction as is isospin symmetry (which is violated, because the ##u## and ##d## quark masses are not the same, and the difference is also a few MeV).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GIM
Thank you, @vanhees71.
What kind is the scale ##4\pi {f_\pi }##?
Now, you changed my question into the relation between quark masses and pion decay constant. Then, again, what reasoning makes me ignore the masses?
(For example, when I learned the pion decay, my professor used the formula ##\left\langle 0 \right|\bar u{\gamma ^5}d\left| {{\pi ^ - }} \right\rangle = \frac{{\sqrt 2 {f_\pi }m_\pi ^2}}{{\left( {{m_u} + {m_d}} \right)}}##. In this case, the massless limit gives "unacceptable result" and I think I have no hope to find the relation between the pion decay constant and the quark masses. I guess my example is beyond the main direction of my question and if so, then please ignore this. Thank you.)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K