Is recycling really that cost efficient?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimmy p
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Recycling
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the cost efficiency of recycling, particularly in relation to metals and organic compounds. Participants explore various aspects of recycling, including economic factors, environmental considerations, and the implications of future resource availability.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that recycling certain metals, like aluminum, is cost-effective due to the high costs of extraction.
  • Others question whether there are organic compounds or metals that are cheaper to produce than to recycle.
  • One participant argues that for precious metals, processing ore may be cheaper than buying scrap, despite higher processing costs.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes the environmental aspect of recycling, suggesting that keeping the planet clean is a significant goal, even if recycling has economic drawbacks.
  • A participant raises concerns about the long-term costs of producing new materials versus recycling, suggesting that current market conditions favor new production but may change in the future.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the cost efficiency of recycling versus new production, with no consensus on whether recycling is universally cost-effective or beneficial. The discussion remains unresolved regarding specific materials and their economic implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully defined what is meant by "recycling," and there are assumptions about future market conditions and resource availability that remain unexamined.

jimmy p
Gold Member
Messages
419
Reaction score
73
Is recycling really that cost efficient? I know that with some metals (eg. aluminium) it is cheaper to recycle because extraction is a ghastly and expensive process, but are there and organic compounds and metals which are cheaper to produce than recycle?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
are there none? i only posted it here because we do 'extraction of metals' in chemistry.
 
That really depends on what you mean by recycle. If you're talking about precious metals, for example, then it's obviously cheaper to process ore than to buy scrap, even
if the actual processing costs are higher.
 
Isn't the whole point of recylcing that we keep the planet clean? Garbage has to go somewhere, if you are willing to move (Jimmy) we might use some island as a dumpyard
 
what the...? you can't use Britain as a dumpyard, who would i live with?? is it an offer Monique? Anyway what so good about keeping the planet clean if you are wasting non-renewable resources recycling materials. There are other things to consider.
 
It is also a question of future costs. Now, it is cheaper to make new plastic out of petroleum. Someday, that may not be so. By doing some recycling now, we delay that time. This is one of those things the market can not achieve. Market forces alone would dictate making new plastic, and discarding the old plastic for some time. Then, when recycling becomes profitable, the used plastic would all be in landfills, and not economic to retrieve.

Njorl
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
555