Why the Carnot cycle is not used with real engines?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the reasons why the Carnot cycle is not utilized in real engines, exploring theoretical versus practical applications of thermodynamic cycles. Participants reference various cycles, including the Stirling and Otto cycles, and discuss the implications of entropy and heat transfer in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the Carnot cycle assumes a temperature gradient for heat transfer, which is physically impossible in practice.
  • Others clarify that the Carnot cycle operates between two temperature sinks and is considered the ideal cycle for maximum efficiency, but it cannot be achieved in reality due to entropy considerations.
  • A participant mentions that while the Stirling cycle can achieve maximum theoretical efficiency similar to the Carnot cycle, it is more practical to use other cycles like the Otto cycle in real applications.
  • There is a discussion about isothermal processes, with some participants asserting that isothermal heat transfer is not feasible without a temperature gradient, while others note that it can occur in specific conditions, such as with saturated liquid-vapor mixtures.
  • One participant emphasizes that even in the case of saturated liquids, a temperature gradient is necessary for heat transfer to occur effectively.
  • Another point raised is that the Carnot cycle's defining characteristic is the absence of entropy change, which is complicated by the behavior of the working fluid and not just mechanical imperfections.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of the Carnot cycle and the conditions required for heat transfer, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the practical applications of theoretical cycles, particularly regarding assumptions about heat transfer and entropy that may not hold in real-world scenarios.

electric_head_uk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have a question on Why the Carnot cycle is not used with real engines? I need to refer to real cycles in my explanation.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Carnot cycle uses the same temperature for heat transfer something that is physically impossible(there needs to be a temperature gradient for heat transfer).
 
That isn't really true. The carnot cycle does operate between two temperature sinks.

The carnot cycle is merely a cycle which assumes that there is no increase in entropy due to imperfections. It is useful because it is the pinnacle of thermodynamic cycles and it can tell you thinks like the maximum efficiency any cycle can reach when operating between two given temperatures. It isn't used because it cannot be achieved, it just isn't possible.

However, the stirling cycle is implementable and has a maximum theoretical efficiency which matches the carnot cycle. Stirling engines are used in a few applications, like a stirling cryocooler, successfully. However, it is generally more practical to use mechanical devices which run on other cycles like an Otto cycle (automobile) for example.
 
I know there are two different temperatures but the heat transfer takes place isothermally which is physically impossible.
So that is different than isentropic because no imperfections which off course is a requirement that also needs to be met.

There is isothermal expansion, adiabatic expansion, isothermal compression, adiabatic compression. I should have stated more clearly that there IS a heat source and sink which are at different temperatures.
 
Last edited:
The heat transfer can take place at one temperature if it is a saturated liquid vapor mixture. But you are correct, if the cycle is for a single phase fluid it also cannot happen.
 
These are always interesting discussions. However, even do a saturated liquid can absorb heat isothermally, there still needs to be some kind of gradient at its boundary to get the energy into the saturated system, whether heats enters through conduction, convention or through some radiative means. Holding a source against the body of interest at equal temperature simply will not produce any flow of heat. Even in theory this would happen at an infinitesimally small pace. That is why Carnot cycles cannot operate in real life.
 
As stated in post 3, the defining characteristic of the Carnot cycle is the lack of a change in entropy through the different processes. This isn't just a matter of friction in parts, but there is entropy lost due to the behavior of the working fluid itself.
 
Hi there:

Here are a few plots regarding the Carnot Cycle operation and usefulness.

Slide21.GIF


Slide22.GIF


Slide23.GIF


Thanks,

Gordan
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
769
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K