How to picture the vector potential?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rick16
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the treatment of the vector potential in the context of classical mechanics, specifically referencing Susskind's Lagrangian formulation for the magnetic field. The key takeaway is the necessity of recognizing that the vector potential, denoted as ##\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{A}(x,y,z,t)##, is a function of all spatial coordinates and time, requiring the use of the full total derivative when calculating its time derivative. Participants emphasized the importance of understanding the general case of vector fields, where each component can depend on multiple variables, rather than assuming independence among them.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and Lagrangian dynamics
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic theory, particularly vector potentials
  • Basic understanding of time-dependent fields in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lagrangian for electromagnetic fields in detail
  • Explore the concept of vector fields and their properties in depth
  • Learn about the implications of time-dependent vector potentials in electromagnetism
  • Review concrete examples of vector potentials in physical systems, such as solenoids and current-carrying wires
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics and electromagnetism, as well as educators seeking to clarify the concept of vector potentials and their applications.

Rick16
Messages
158
Reaction score
46
TL;DR
developing the Lorentz force law from the Lagrangian for the magnetic field
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##.

I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt} =\frac {dA_x} {dx} \frac {dx} {dt}##, ignoring the other terms. How can I know that each component of the vector potential depends on all the coordinates? I would have to somehow picture the vector potential in order to come to this conclusion, but the vector potential seems to be a purely theoretical construct. How can I know how to treat it in situations like this one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, in the general case ##\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{A}(x,y,z,t)## is some vector field that depends on position (and time), and you'll need to use the full total derivative, e.g.

##\dot{A}_x = (\partial_x A_x) \dot{x} + (\partial_y A_x) \dot{y} + (\partial_z A_x) \dot{z} + (\partial_t A_x)##

If the field changes with time, then ##\partial_t \mathbf{A}## will also be non-zero.

Why don't you have a look at a few concrete examples, e.g. wires, solenoids...:
https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_14.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and PeroK
Thank you, I think I got it. If I have any vector field ##\vec v=\vec v(x,y,z)##, then in general the componentes would be ##v_x =v_x(x,y,z), v_y=v_y(x,y,z), v_z=v_z(x,y,z)##, and only in a special case would I have ##v_x=v_x(x), v_y=v_y(y), v_z=v_z(z)##. If I don't know what a vector field actually looks like, I have to assume the general case. For some reason, I assumed ##v_x=v_x(x), v_y=v_y(y), v_z=v_z(z)##, and it already seems strange to me why I assumed that. Sorry to have bothered you with this.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and ergospherical

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
733
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
686
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
857
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
608
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K