Lean Proof Found To Be False

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 2K views
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
4,286
Reaction score
3,425
From AI. I'm too lazy to check it.
  • Publication: On July 25, 2026, Ramana Kumar published an AI-assisted Lean repository containing a sorry-free formal proof purporting to show that the Collatz conjecture was false by exhibiting an orbit that does not return to 1. [1, 2]
  • The Kernel Bug (Issue #14576): The proof did not contain a valid mathematical refutation. Instead, it exploited an implementation bug in how the Lean 4 kernel handled nested inductive types with phantom parameters. When eliminating a nested occurrence, these parameters disappeared from the generated auxiliary type, allowing an ill-typed term to bypass checks and prove a contradiction (False). [1]
  • Independent Checker Bug: The repository also coincidentally bypassed an independent checker (Nanoda) due to a separate, unrelated bug in Nanoda's projection node verification. [1]
  • The Fix: Kiran Gopinathan reduced the exploit to a small proof of False on July 28, 2026, and Lean's creator Leonardo de Moura pushed a patch to fix the kernel bug within an hour. The Collatz conjecture remains completely unresolved. [1, 2]
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Baluncore, FactChecker and sbrothy
Physics news on Phys.org
ANYTHING that relies on unfiltered internet "knowledge" is on very shaky ground.
 
If you mean that as critique I’ll take it as such, it just looked pretty valid.

Nothing personal.
 
sbrothy said:
If you mean that as critique I’ll take it as such, it just looked pretty valid.

Nothing personal.
Nothing personal. I know nothing about this subject, but I am very skeptical, in general, about the current wave of AI LLM efforts. IMO, any AI LLM results require very careful review.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: loop quantum gravity and sbrothy