Momentum Operator question - Proof found in Intro to Griffiths QM

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the momentum operator in quantum mechanics as presented in Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics." The user, Abate, queries why integration by parts is only applied to the second term in the time derivative of the expectation value of momentum. The response clarifies that performing integration by parts on either term yields equivalent results, explaining the simplification from 2m to m. This highlights the flexibility in applying integration techniques in quantum mechanics derivations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically momentum operators.
  • Familiarity with Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics."
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly integration by parts.
  • Basic concepts of wave functions and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the momentum operator in Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics."
  • Study the concept of expectation values in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about integration techniques, specifically integration by parts in the context of quantum mechanics.
  • Explore advanced topics in quantum mechanics, such as the role of wave functions and operators.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of momentum operators and integration techniques in quantum theory.

srabate
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all

I am trying to go through the Griffiths Intro to QM book and I'm afraid I'm already stumped!

He determines the momentum operator by beginning with the following equation:

<x>=\int_{-\infty}^\infty {x|\psi(x)|^2}

He takes the time derivative and manipulates the integral:
(I'm skipping a few steps because I thought they made sense. If you want me to type them up I will)

\frac{d<x>}{dt} = -\frac{i\hbar}{2m}\int_{-\infty}^\infty {\psi^\ast(x)\frac{\partial\psi(x)}{\partial x} - \psi(x)\frac{\partial\psi^\ast(x)}{\partial x}}dx

Then, he randomly says "Performing integration by parts on the second term, we conclude: "

\frac{d<x>}{dt} = -\frac{i\hbar}{m}\int_{-\infty}^\infty {\psi^\ast(x)\frac{\partial\psi(x)}{\partial x}dx}

Why do we not perform integration by parts on the first term? I feel like I'm missing something really stupid. Is there some sort of assumption that would allow us to combine the first and second terms? (which would explain why the 2m becomes just m).

Thank you!
Abate

p.s. attached are the two pages from griffiths where this is found.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

All you have to note is that by performing integration by parts for the second term:
\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty} \psi \frac{ \partial \psi^* } {\partial x} \mathrm d x = 0 + \int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty} \psi^* \frac{ \partial \psi } {\partial x} \mathrm d x
which is equal to the first term. This explain the disappearance of the factor 2.

(You could've also done integration by parts on the first term instead, in which case you would've gotten the same as the 2nd term.)
 
of course! I have no idea how I didn't see that.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
499
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K