Linear Transformation/Injective/Surjective

  • Thread starter Thread starter embury
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of linear transformations, specifically focusing on a 2x3 matrix and its properties regarding injectivity and surjectivity. The original poster presents a problem involving the matrix A as a linear transformation from R3 to R2 and seeks clarification on whether it is injective or surjective.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to determine injectivity by solving Ax=0 and concludes that A cannot be injective due to the presence of a free variable. For surjectivity, they argue that the matrix is consistent, suggesting that A is surjective. Other participants inquire about the definitions of injective and surjective, seeking to clarify the original poster's understanding of these concepts.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing definitions and asking clarifying questions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of injectivity and surjectivity, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's conclusions.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definitions provided for injective and surjective functions, and participants are exploring the implications of these definitions in relation to the matrix A. The original poster expresses some confusion and seeks further assistance, indicating a need for clarification on the problem.

embury
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am extremely confused when it comes to linearly transformations and am not sure I entirely understand the concept. I have the following assignment question:

Consider the 2x3 matrix
A=
1 1 1
0 1 1
as a linear transformation from R3 to R2.
a) Determine whether A is a injective (one-to-one) function.
b) Determine whether A is a surjective (onto) function.

For a) I said that we need to solve Ax=0 and the matrix then looks like:

1 1 1 : 0
0 1 1 : 0

Since x3 is a free variable A cannot be injective.

For b) I have the matrix:
1 1 1 : *
0 1 1 : *
(note that it doesn't matter what * is)

This matrix is consistent so the matrix A is surjective.

Am I understanding this question correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the definitions of injective and surjective?
 
AKG said:
Do you know the definitions of injective and surjective?
The definitions we were given are:

Injective: A linear transformation T: R^p -->R^m is injective (one to one) if and only if the equation Tx=0 has only the solution x=0.

Surjective: If T:R^p --> R^m is linear then T is surjective if and only if the system Tx=b is consistent for all vectors b in all real numbers m.
 
By "the system Tx = b is consistent" you mean "the equation Tx = b has a solution" i.e. "there exists x such that Tx = b"?

For part a), find a nonzero vector x such that Ax = 0.

For part b), given a vector b = (b1 b2)T (T denotes transpose), can you find a vector x = (x1 x2 x3)T such that Tx = b?
 
AKG said:
By "the system Tx = b is consistent" you mean "the equation Tx = b has a solution" i.e. "there exists x such that Tx = b"?

For part a), find a nonzero vector x such that Ax = 0.

For part b), given a vector b = (b1 b2)T (T denotes transpose), can you find a vector x = (x1 x2 x3)T such that Tx = b?
Thank you for your help, I think I understand. If not, I'll be back. :biggrin: Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K