First up is M13, 20 exposures of 30 seconds

  • Stargazing
  • Thread starter Brinx
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Seconds
In summary: I've been taking more 15 second exposures as opposed to 30 second exposures as I find the shorter exposures easier to manage. You could probably see some pretty good images with an 80mm scope, but I'm not sure if you'd be able to see the stars as clearly. For objects that are fainter, you might need more exposure.
  • #1
Brinx
69
1
Last night I played around a bit with my small bresser skylux telescope (70/700 refractor) in combination with a ToUcam pro II webcam. I made a mosaic of the moon out of 7 separate AVIs which were stacked in registax. The seeing wasn't very good (it's been quite warm here in Holland lately!) and the moon was only about 20 degrees above the horizon. Click on the link for a full-size version (1000x1200 pixels).

http://img88.imageshack.us/my.php?image=moon150720062kd7.png
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Nice job Brinx!
 
  • #4
...Continued from my "I Did It thread. First night using the new scope, I'm going for quantity over quality tonight - I'm using my old DSI Color instead of my new DSI II b/w. This way I get color images in one shot instead of needing 4 sets. Obviously, the sensitivity is lower, and the resolution is too. So far, my paper dew shield is getting the job done...

First up is M13, 20 exposures of 30 seconds. Though I took some 5 and 15 second exposures to compare, I'll call this my first real image with this scope. In darkening the background, I may have clipped it a little. I only spent a few minutes on the processing.
 

Attachments

  • m13-30a.jpg
    m13-30a.jpg
    14.1 KB · Views: 522
Last edited:
  • #5
Here's M57 - about 40 30 second subs.

Also, not an astrophoto, but a good one of me with the scope. Note the Pleaides in the background (totally accidental). It's a 5 second exposure with a flaslight illuminating the telescope.
 

Attachments

  • M57-30a.jpg
    M57-30a.jpg
    14 KB · Views: 509
  • russscope1.jpg
    russscope1.jpg
    25.4 KB · Views: 549
  • #6
M27, 20 frames, 30 sec. Perhaps I forgot to turn on dark subtraction - I got a lot of hot pixels and amp glow. I'll have to go back and work on that. Still, some of the faint nebulosity (the handlebars) is visible.
 

Attachments

  • M27-30a.jpg
    M27-30a.jpg
    18.8 KB · Views: 513
  • #7
Over Thanksgiving, I took my telescope to the Poconos and spent 9 hours in a random parking lot... (yes, I am somewhat insane)

First up is a 45 second luminance frame of M81. I took rgb photos too, but in the 4 hours since I set up, the temperature dropped 30 degrees, my telescope shrank and went out of focus, and I didn't notice. Oops - still climbing that learning curve...

M77 came out pretty well, but the stars are slightly elongated from continued minor tracking issues (its a lot better, though).

M15 shows a big improvement over that M13 photo from a month ago. The scope was a little out of collimation, which I think is why the stars were a little smeared on that one.

I'll probably need to start autoguiding soon. I was hoping for consistent tracking up to 2 minutes, but it isn't happening. I may be able to tweak the mount a little (the tracking is better sometimes than others, suggesting an adjustment in the gears may help), but at my focal length, I probably won't be able to get it to take longer exposures without a guidescope.
 

Attachments

  • m81.jpg
    m81.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 475
  • M77.jpg
    M77.jpg
    19.7 KB · Views: 507
  • M15.jpg
    M15.jpg
    27.3 KB · Views: 527
Last edited:
  • #8
I also redid M27. I think I need some work in color balancing - M27 is more green than my image has it.
 

Attachments

  • m27.jpg
    m27.jpg
    14.3 KB · Views: 493
  • #9
Those are some pretty cool photos. What kind of telescope would one need to see stuff like that? How much exposure do you need?
 
  • #10
My new telescope is the Orion Atlas 11 (a C11 with an Orion Atlas mount) in 147 and the camera is a Meade DSI II Pro. The objects I've taken pictures of already are relatively bright, so you don't need quite that much for them (though more exposure would be good).
 

1. What is M13?

M13 is a globular cluster located in the constellation Hercules. It is made up of hundreds of thousands of stars and is approximately 25,000 light years away from Earth.

2. What do you mean by "20 exposures"?

Exposures refer to the amount of time the camera's shutter is open to capture light from the subject. In this case, the camera took 20 separate photos of M13, each with a duration of 30 seconds.

3. Why do you need to take multiple exposures?

Taking multiple exposures allows for a longer total exposure time, resulting in a clearer and more detailed image. It also helps to reduce noise and improve overall image quality.

4. What is the significance of 30 seconds?

30 seconds is a standard exposure time used in astrophotography. It is long enough to capture a sufficient amount of light, but not so long that the stars will appear blurry due to Earth's rotation.

5. What can be learned from these images?

These images can help scientists study the structure, composition, and evolution of M13. They can also provide insight into the formation of globular clusters and the dynamics of stars within them.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
34
Views
12K
Back
Top