Add "Systems Science" to Forum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OmCheeto
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential addition of "Systems Science" to the forum, possibly under the "Other Sciences" category. Participants express concerns about the implications of such a move, particularly regarding past issues with thread relocations. There is a call for increased activity in the topic before considering its own forum. The concept of systems science is described as encompassing various theories and approaches, emphasizing the importance of downward causation alongside traditional bottom-up causality. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexity and interdisciplinary nature of systems science.
OmCheeto
Gold Member
Messages
2,471
Reaction score
3,326
Has there been any discussion regarding the addition of "Systems Science" to the forum? Perhaps under the "Other Sciences" heading. I've seen people question why a certain topic is listed under "Earth Science", and have seen the response that; "It is a multi-disciplinary science".

Or would this open up a 10 year old can of "we've moved your thread because" worms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not aware of such a discussion, but I've been a member even less time than you Om. I believe we would have to see a lot of activity posted on a topic before considering giving it its own forum.

Does the Engineering Systems & Design forum come anywhere close to what you have in mind? Please excuse my ignorance about this field.
 
OmCheeto - what's your idea of systems science?

These days, I would see it centred around hierarchy theory, dissipative structure theory, Peircean semiotics, complex adaptive systems, second order cybernetics, generative neural networks, relational biology, scalefree networks, condensed matter physics and self-organising systems.

So quite a variety of currently active approaches. But most distinguished by a recognition of some kind of downward causation to complement the usual bottom-up causality of atomistic and mechanistic modelling - which is what makes a system more than the sum of its parts.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Back
Top