How are energy and work related?

  • Thread starter Thread starter teggenspiller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Work
AI Thread Summary
Energy and work are closely related concepts in physics, particularly through the relationship between kinetic energy (KE) and work. Kinetic energy is defined as KE = 1/2 * m * v^2, while work is calculated using the formula W = F * d * cos(theta). In the context of a problem involving a brick changing speed, the net work done can be determined by finding the change in kinetic energy, confirming that KE and work are interconnected. The discussion emphasizes that when force and displacement are aligned, the work done is equivalent to the change in kinetic energy. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving problems involving energy and work.
teggenspiller
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
how are energy and work related??

Homework Statement


so there is potential and kinetic energy, which together or separate make up mechanical energy. pe comes in two types, spring(elastic) and gravitational. potential energy=mass*grav*height. kinetic energy applies to objects who are moving. ke+1/2*m*v^2

okay, so that's all fine and dandy, i get that.
next, i have work. Work=force*displacement*cos(theta)-->angle between the force and the displacement vector.

but what happens when i have a question that asks me something such as
7. A 5.0-kg brick is moving horizontally at 6.0 m/s. In order to change its speed to 10.0 m/s, the net work done on the brick must be:

A. 40 J
B. 90 J
C. 160 J
D. 400 J
E. 550 J
Right Points Earned: 1/1
Your C

i infact, got it correct.
using knet=kfin-kin

however, the info they give me
m=5
v=6

vf=10
is good for finding the KINETIC ENERGY (refer to equations)

but they specifically ask for "net WORK"


i got it right by doing the only thing that made since, finding the net kinetic energy...


(2. Homework Equations )

so does this must mean the KE is closely related to WORK...

(3. The Attempt at a Solution )

but how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Take a look at the equation you used:

<br /> K_{net} = K_f - K_i = \frac{1}{2}mv_f^2 - \frac{1}{2}mv_i^2 = \frac{1}{2}m (v_f^2 - v_i^2) = \frac{1}{2}m(v_f - v_i)(v_f + v_i) = \frac{(v_f + v_i)}{2} (v_f - v_i) m
K_{net} = (v_{average})(\Delta v) m<br />

Note that:
v_{avg} = \frac{\Delta d}{\Delta t}
and
a = \frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t} \Rightarrow \Delta v = a \Delta t

So,
K_{net} = (v_{average})(\Delta v) m = \frac{\Delta d}{\Delta t}(a \Delta t)m = (\Delta d)(ma) = F \Delta d
K_{net} = W

It may not be immediately obvious, but the equation you used is simply a derivation of the work formula, assuming that force applied is the same as the direction of motion, so that the work formula is just W = F \Delta d cos(0) = F \Delta d. In this problem everything is in one line, so the displacement, velocity, acceleration, and force vectors are all parallel, so that is a fair assumption.
 


whooa!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top