Is There a General Theorem for the Sum or Difference of Terms^n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhenrique
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the existence of a general theorem for the sum or difference of terms raised to the power of n, particularly focusing on binomials. It highlights that the expression (x^n - y^n) can be factored as (x - y)(x^(n-1) + x^(n-2)y + ... + y^(n-1)), which is a foundational result in algebra. The conversation also touches on the sum of a geometric series and its relation to these expressions, particularly when x is less than 1 and n approaches infinity. Additionally, specific formulas for sums of cubes and higher odd powers are mentioned, with a note that a formula for sums involving three variables is not widely recognized. The discussion emphasizes the importance of deriving generalizations through specific examples and careful observation.
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
Binomials

I was verifying that \\x^2-y^2=(x-y)(x+y) \\x^3-y^3=(x-y)(x^2+xy+y^2) and I realized that can there is a formulation more general like the theorem binomial... my question is: exist a general theorem for sum or difference of terms^n ?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can always proceed with the division of x^n-y^n by x-y.
Then you can guess and then demonstrate what the general solution is.

For example:

(x^11 - y^11)/ (x - y) =
x^10 + x^9 y + x^8 y^2 + x^7 y^3 + x^6 y^4 + x^5 y^5 + x^4 y^6 + x^3 y^7 + x^2 y^8 + x y^9 + y^10

Try to be specific and by considering multiple examples, you can often find the path to a generalization.
Never try to be general too early.
 
(xn - yn) = (x - y)(xn-1 + xn-2y + xn-3y2 + ... + yn-1)

is considered fairly elementary, but often useful. It is fairly easy to see it is true if you just multiply the x of the first bracket by the second bracket on one line and -y from the first bracket by the second bracket on the second line you will see.

A connection you should not fail to observe is that this gives you the answer to getting the sum of a geometric series which is

1 + x + x2 + xn-1

(I have made the final term xn for easy comparison, but you you'll be able to see what the sum is if the final term is xn).

The most useful of all applications of this is when x < 1 and n is infinite.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
epenguin said:
(xn - yn) = (x - y)(xn-1 + xn-2y + xn-3y2 + ... + yn-1)

Very good!

And which the formula for xn + yn and for xn + yn + zn?
 
Jhenrique said:
Very good!

And which the formula for xn + yn and for xn + yn + zn?
There is a well-known formula for x3 + y3 (= (x + y)(x2 - xy + y2), and formulas for higher odd powers of xn + yn are fairly well known. Hint: one factor is x + y. You can get the other factor by long division.

If there's a formula for xn + yn + zn I'm not aware of it.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top