Pascal's Triangle for non-commutative?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the concept of a non-commutative version of Pascal's triangle, particularly in the context of operators used in bra-ket notation. Participants examine how the properties of non-commutativity affect the expansion of expressions like (a + b)^n, focusing on both even and odd powers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about a non-commutative version of Pascal's triangle for operators, noting that for (a + b)^2, the terms do not commute (ab ≠ ba).
  • Another participant suggests that for even powers, such as (x + y)^4, the cross-terms can be assumed to be split between their orderings, referencing coefficients from Pascal's triangle.
  • A different participant presents the expansion of (a + b)^3, concluding that the only possible row in the triangle for general non-commutative numbers would be "1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1," indicating a potential difficulty in generalizing the coefficients.
  • One participant emphasizes that the essence of Pascal's triangle is to count distinct arrangements of terms, which does not hold in non-commutative multiplication, leading to all terms being distinct.
  • Another participant reiterates that for (x + y)^4, the terms mentioned do not appear in the expansion, except possibly in special cases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on how non-commutativity affects the structure of the triangle, with some suggesting that distinct arrangements lead to a uniform row of coefficients, while others explore the implications for specific powers. The discussion remains unresolved regarding a clear formulation of a non-commutative Pascal's triangle.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in generalizing the concept of Pascal's triangle to non-commutative scenarios, particularly regarding the treatment of coefficients and the distinct nature of terms in expansions.

Pythagorean
Science Advisor
Messages
4,430
Reaction score
327
I was curious if there was a non-commutative version of Pascal's triangle for operators (such as those used in brah-ket notation)

The important note is that (a + b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 + ab +ba
where ba != ab
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm guess if it's an even power such as (x + y)^4

you can always assume the cross-terms are split between their orderings, so from pascal's triangle, which gives the coefficients 1 4 6 4 1, the middle coefficient corresponds to 3x^2y^2 + 3y^2x^2.

Not quite sure how to handle odd degrees without doing pages of algebra.

I'm posting in this forum because tensors have the non-commutative property and I happen to be applying brah-ket notation so I thought it fit. Apologies if not.
 
This is interesting.

Going by (a+b)^3 = a^3 + a^2*b+aba + ab^2 + ba^2 + bab + b^2*a + b^3

It would seem that the only possible row in the "triangle" for general noncommuntative numbers would be "1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1". The exact form may depend on just how uncommutative the number are.
 
ObsessiveMathsFreak said:
This is interesting.

Going by (a+b)^3 = a^3 + a^2*b+aba + ab^2 + ba^2 + bab + b^2*a + b^3

It would seem that the only possible row in the "triangle" for general noncommuntative numbers would be "1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1". The exact form may depend on just how uncommutative the number are.

wow, that looks like it may be difficult to generalize with something like Pascal's triangle. Maybe not the coefficients themselves, but the degree of each term. You'd have to have two degree functions for each variable (i.e. one for <x| and one for |x>)
 
The point of Pascal's triangle is that the i,j entry simply counts the number of ways you can order i "x"s and j-i "y"s. If your multiplication is not commutative, those do not add. All terms are distinct. That's why ObsessiveMathFreak says you just get "1 1 1 ...".
 
Pythagorean said:
I'm guess if it's an even power such as (x + y)^4

you can always assume the cross-terms are split between their orderings, so from pascal's triangle, which gives the coefficients 1 4 6 4 1, the middle coefficient corresponds to 3x^2y^2 + 3y^2x^2.
Just to make sure it's said... those terms do not appear in the expansion of (x+y)^4. (except possibly for special cases)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K