How Can I Estimate Local Sidereal Time in My Head?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bossman27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Local Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating Local Sidereal Time (LST) in a practical, mental manner, particularly for individuals new to astronomy. Participants explore various methods and considerations for making rough calculations based on their local time and geographical location.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes their location at 97.7 degrees W of Greenwich and suggests subtracting roughly 5.5 hours from Sidereal time at Greenwich, while another argues it should be closer to 6.5 hours based on longitude.
  • Participants discuss the relationship between solar time and sidereal time, mentioning that the change is about 4 minutes per day or approximately one degree, but there is uncertainty about the exact adjustment needed for sidereal time.
  • There is a question regarding the origin of the 360 degrees in a circle, with some suggesting it relates to the Earth's movement around the Sun and others referencing its divisibility by various factors.
  • A later post provides a formula for calculating LST precisely using Julian Date and other parameters, indicating a desire for a more accurate method beyond mental calculations.
  • Another participant shares a "back of the napkin" method for estimating LST, detailing a step-by-step approach that includes assumptions and acknowledges potential inaccuracies in the estimation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate adjustment for longitude when calculating LST, with no consensus reached on the exact method for mental estimation. The discussion includes both precise calculations and rough estimation techniques, indicating a range of opinions and approaches.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention assumptions made during calculations, such as the impact of Daylight Savings Time and the approximation of LST at specific times of the year, which may affect the accuracy of their estimates.

bossman27
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
Pretty elementary question here, but I'm new to astronomy and I'm having trouble estimating LST. Online sources give me the exact formula, but this doesn't really help me on the fly. My location is 97.7-ish degrees W of Greenwich, which I know means I can subtract roughly 5.5 hours from Sidereal time at Greenwich.
I know that at the vernal equinox in march is when the ecliptic cross the equator, solar noon at Greenwich (lat. 0) = RA of 0, and the autumnal equinox in September is at an RA of 12h, so the change between sidereal time and solar time is about 4 minutes per day or about a degree. I can kind of picture how this is happening qualitatively, but I'm kind of lost on roughly quantifying it for a particular day/time/location.
My professor will say something like "Ok, it's September 17th, and it's 8:15pm here, which means it's 1:15am in Greenwich, so roughly what is our LST?"
Obviously he's just looking for a rough estimate within a few minutes or so of the actual LST, so how do I go about doing this in my head?

Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
bossman27 said:
My location is 97.7-ish degrees W of Greenwich, which I know means I can subtract roughly 5.5 hours from Sidereal time at Greenwich.

97.7/15 is more like 6.5 hours.

I know that at the vernal equinox in march is when the ecliptic cross the equator, solar noon at Greenwich (lat. 0) = RA of 0, and the autumnal equinox in September is at an RA of 12h, so the change between sidereal time and solar time is about 4 minutes per day or about a degree.

Greenwich is 0 degrees longitude.

at noon in your local solar time, the sun is due south. and i think it's the same for solar and sidereal at some equinox, just can remember which.

60 minutes per 15 degrees of longitude is something i understand. don't know about 4 degrees per day for sidereal. i thought that adjustment would be more like 1 degree longitude per day which would be about 4 minutes. (or more precisely 360/365.25 degrees per day.)

is that where 360 degrees per rotation comes from? that we have approximately 360 days per year and the Earth (in it's non-circular orbit) moves in one day about 1 degree around the Sun (with respect to distant stars)? i always thought it was something about being divisible by so many factors; 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18, 20, 24, 30, 36, 40, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120, 180.
 
rbj said:
97.7/15 is more like 6.5 hours.

Greenwich is 0 degrees longitude.

Right. The adjustment is 6.5 hours, I just wrote 5 on accident because during daylight savings our clocks are 5 instead of 6 hours earlier than Greenwhich, but obviously that doesn't affect longitude. Latitude was a misstatement on my part.

rbj said:
60 minutes per 15 degrees of longitude is something i understand. don't know about 4 degrees per day for sidereal. i thought that adjustment would be more like 1 degree longitude per day which would be about 4 minutes. (or more precisely 360/365.25 degrees per day.)

I believe I did say it's about 4 minutes or one degree.

rbj said:
is that where 360 degrees per rotation comes from? that we have approximately 360 days per year and the Earth (in it's non-circular orbit) moves in one day about 1 degree around the Sun (with respect to distant stars)? i always thought it was something about being divisible by so many factors; 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18, 20, 24, 30, 36, 40, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120, 180.

Interesting question! I've always thought that as well, but Wikipedia says that both of those are possible reasons for using 360 degrees, although apparently no one knows the exact origin.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_(angle)#History
 
You need Julian Date and Days Since 1-1-2000 to calculate LST correctly:

JD = 367*yr - floor(7/4*(yr+floor((mo+9)/12))) + floor(275*mo/9) + dy + (hr -tz -dst+mn/60)/24 + 1721013.5
where tz - timezone
and dst =1 when Daylight Savings Time is on dst=0 otherwise.

d = JD - 2451545.0

LST = 280.46061837 + 360.985647366*d - LongitudeEastPositive
 
I knew the correct algorithm for calculating LST precisely, but didn't know how to do a "back of the napkin" or mental calculation for it. Just figured it out, so I figured I'd post it on the off chance someone looks up this thread needing it:

For Greenwich, their local celestial meridian is at 0h RA is at noon on the Spring Equinox (March 21). This also means it's at 12h RA at noon on the fall equinox. For ease of calculation you can also assume (although it's approx. 2 minutes off) that at midnight on these dates LST is approx. 12h and 0h, respectively.

Now, the sidereal day is about 23hrs, 56 minutes per solar 24hr day. This means that at solar midnight (or noon) your local sidereal time will be about 4 minutes later than it was on the previous day, at the same civil time.

You can use this (offset) * (number of days) to get an approximate Greenwich sidereal time, then offset for your latitude.

An example:
Right now, it's approx. 10pm (22:00) local civil time (5 hrs earlier than GT due to daylight savings). This means it's about 3:00 in Greenwich (universal time).
Today is Sept 27. (fall equinox was Sept. 23rd).
This means that at civil midnight in Greenwich today:
==> LST was about 0:00 + 4*(4 days) = 0:16
==> LST in Greenwich right now is approximately 0:16 + 3:00 = 3:16
==> LST in Austin right now (97.7 W or about 6.5 hrs W) = 3:16 - 6:30 = 20:44

Now, I made some assumptions here, and according to an online LST calcular, I'm about 9 minutes off. But again, I was just looking for the approximate LST. This estimation is generally good enough for the purpose of figuring out which objects will be observable of the course of the night, etc.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K