Formulae for Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory, and Perturbation Theory

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ouabache
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulae Topics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread proposes a collection of formulae relevant to Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory, and Perturbation Theory, as well as other topics such as Maxwell's Equations and heat transfer in engineering. The aim is to provide a convenient reference for participants to access and utilize these formulae in discussions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests creating a thread for storing useful formulae for easier access and LaTeX generation.
  • Maxwell's Equations are presented in both integral and differential forms, with details on their applications in the absence of magnetic and polarizable media.
  • Euler's Equation is discussed in the context of electrical engineering, with derivations for cosine and sine functions provided.
  • Heat transfer across cylindrical tubes is analyzed using Fourier's Law, with specific equations for heat transfer and heat flux presented.
  • Average convection heat transfer coefficient is defined along with the change in log mean temperature, with relevant variables explained.
  • Quantum Mechanics is introduced with various equations, including the Dirac equation and Klein-Gordon equation, alongside definitions of Clifford algebra and Lagrangians for Quantum Field Theory.
  • Perturbation Theory is discussed with a focus on the mathematical formulation of the interaction picture and Schwinger-Dyson equations of motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion includes multiple competing views and approaches, particularly in the context of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory. There is no consensus on the interpretations or applications of the presented formulae.

Contextual Notes

Some formulae may depend on specific assumptions or definitions that are not fully elaborated upon in the posts. The applicability of certain equations may vary based on the context in which they are used.

Ouabache
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,345
Reaction score
10
To allow easier access to formulae we commonly refer to within various topics and as a time saver when wanting to generate them in LaTex for discussions, I propose this thread as a convenient place to store useful formulae (to copy and paste as appropriate within threads).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Maxwell's Equations - Integral Form

Maxwell's Equations - Integral Form

Gauss' Law for Electricity
\epsilon_o \oint E \cdot dA = \sum q
Ampère’s Law
\oint B\cdot ds =\mu_o\int J \cdot dA+ \mu_o \epsilon_o \frac{d}{dt} \int E \cdot dA
Faraday's Law of Induction
\oint E \cdot ds = -\frac{d}{dt}\int B\cdot dA
Gauss' Law for Magnetism
\oint B \cdot dA = 0

alternate forms see ,[/URL] ref2

"Maxwell's Equations are the set of four equations, attributed to James Clerk Maxwell (written by Oliver Heaviside), that describe the behavior of both the electric and magnetic fields, as well as their interactions with matter." [/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maxwell's Equations - Differential Form

Maxwell's Equations - Differential Form

Gauss' Law for Electricity
\nabla \cdot E = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}
Ampère’s Law
\nabla \times B = \mu_0 J + \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial E}{\partial t}
Faraday's Law of Induction
\nabla \times E = -\frac{\partial B}{\partial t}
Gauss' Law for Magnetism

\nabla \cdot B = 0

The above differential and integral forms (previous post) may be used in the absence of magnetic and polarizable media.
Alternate forms see ,[/URL] ref2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Euler's Equation - for engineering

Two Forms of Euler's Equation - commonly used in electrical engineering

e^{+j \theta}= \cos \theta + j \sin \theta
e^{-j\theta}= \cos \theta - j \sin\thetaUsing the above expressions, \cos\theta and \sin\theta can be derived

\cos\theta = \frac{1}{2}(e^{j\theta} + e^{-j\theta})

\sin\theta = \frac{1}{2j}(e^{j\theta}-e^{-j\theta})

Alternate form of Euler's Formula, see ref
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mech Engr - Heat Transfer across Cylindrical Tube

Start with Fourier's Law of Heat Conduction ref1

<br /> \renewcommand{\vec}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $ #1 $}} <br /> \vec{Q} =-k \bar{\nabla} T

For this geometry (cylindrical tubing) by Fourier's Law, ref2

Q=k A \left (\frac {\Delta T}{\Delta r} \right )

Heat Transfer Across Length of Cylindrical Tubing

\mbox {\Huge Q= $\frac {2 \pi k L (T_i-T_o)}{ln (\frac{r_o}{r_i}) }$ }

k - thermal conductivity of material [BTU/(hr-ft-deg F)]
L - length of tube (ft)
T_i - temperature along inside surface of tube (deg F)
T_o - temperature along outside surface of tube (deg F)
r_o - outside tube radius (ft)
r_i - inside tube radius (ft)
Q - heat transfer (BTU/hr)

Heat Flux - Heat Transfer Rate per Unit Area ref3

Q^{&#039;&#039;} = \frac {Q}{A} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \left ( \frac {BTU}{hr \cdot ft^2} \right )

For this geometry

A = 2 \pi r_o L \ \ \ \ \ \ (ft^2)
 
Last edited:
Average convection heat transfer coefficient*

\bar{h} = \frac{\dot{m}c_p(T_{m,o}-T_{m,i})}{\pi D L \ \Delta T_{lm}} \ \ \ \ \ equ. (i)

\dot{m} flow rate of fluid (kg/s)
c_p specific heat at constant pressure [J/(kg-K)]
T_{m,i} mean temperature outside cyl. tube [deg C]
T_{m,o} mean temperature inside cyl. tube [deg C]
D diameter of cyl. tube [m.]
L length of cyl. tube [m.]
\Delta T_{lm} change in the log mean temperature [deg C]
\bar{h} ave. conv. heat transfer coef.[W/(m^2 - deg K)]

Change in Log Mean Temperature*

\Delta T_{lm}=\frac {(T_s - T_{m,o})-(T_s - T_{m,i})}{ln \frac {T_s - T_{m,o}}{T_s - T_{m,i}}} \ \ \ \ equ. (ii)

T_s constant surface temperature [deg C]* from Fundamentals of Heat Transfer by Incropera and DeWitt
 
Last edited:
Hell, I'm bored, so why not.

(There are implicit summations over repeated indices throughout; units with \hbar =c=1)

Quantum Mechanics:

H|\psi (t)\rangle =i\frac{\partial}{\partial t}|\psi (t)\rangle

Non-relativistic in coordinate representation: H=-\frac{\nabla^2}{2M}+V(\vec{x})
Relativistic in coordinate representation:H=\gamma^0\left(-i\mathbf{\gamma}\cdot\mathbf{\nabla} +\gamma^{\mu}V_{\mu}(x)+m) (Dirac)

Clifford algebra defined by Dirac matrices: \{\gamma^{\mu}, \gamma^{\nu}\}=2g^{\mu\nu}

Dirac equation: \left(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m\right)\psi=0
Klein-Gordon equation: \left(\partial^2 +m^2\right)\phi =0

Born approximation: i\mathcal{M}=-i\tilde{V}(\vec{x})

Quantum Field theory:

Dirac Lagrangian: \mathcal{L}=\bar{\psi}\left(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m\right)\psi (\bar{\psi}=\psi^{\dagger}\gamma^0)

Complex Klein-Gordon Lagrangian: \mathcal{L}=\tfrac{1}{2}\left(|\partial_{\mu}\phi |^2-m^2|\phi |^2\right)

Complex Phi-four Lagrangian: \mathcal{L}=\tfrac{1}{2}\left(|\partial_{\mu} \phi |^2-m^2|\phi |^2\right)+\frac{\lambda}{4!}|\phi |^4

Yukawa Lagrangian: \mathcal{L}=\bar{\psi}\left(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m\right)\psi +\tfrac{1}{2}\left(|\partial_{\mu}\phi |^2-m_{\phi}^2|\phi |^2\right)+g\phi\bar{\psi}\psi

QED Lagrangian: \mathcal{L}=\bar{\psi}\left(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m\right)\psi-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}^2+e\bar{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}A_{\mu}\psi

F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}

Yang Mills Lagrangian:

\mathcal{L}=\bar{\psi}\left(i\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}-m\right)\psi+F^a_{\mu\nu}^2

D_{\mu}=\partial_{\mu}-igA^a_{\mu}t^a
F^a_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu}A^a{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A^a{\mu}+gf^{abc}A^b_{\mu}A^c_{\nu}

Where t^a are the n dimensional matrices representing the Lie algebra

[T^a, T^b]=if^{abc}T^c

Feynman functional intergal form of propagation amplitude:
\langle \psi_b|e^{-iHT}|\psi_a\rangle =\int\mathcal{D}\psi\mathcal{D}\pi\exp\left(i{{\textstyle \int^T_0 d^4x\mathcal{L}\left[\psi\right]}\right)

\left(\pi =\frac{\delta S}{\delta\dot{\psi}}\right)

Perturbation Theory:

\langle\Omega |T\left\{\psi (x_n)\cdots\psi (x_1)\right\}|\Omega\rangle =\lim_{T\rightarrow\infty (1-i\epsilon )}\langle 0 |T\left\{\psi (x_n)_I\cdots\psi (x_1)_I\right\exp\left[{\textstyle -i\int^T_{-T} d^4x H_I}\right]\}|0\rangle}\left(\langle 0 |\exp\left[{\textstyle -i\int^T_{-T} d^4x H_I}\right]|0\rangle\right)^{-1}

=\lim_{T\rightarrow\infty (1-i\epsilon )}\frac{\int\mathcal{D}\psi\exp\left(i{\textstyle \int^T_{-T} d^4x\mathcal{L}\left[\psi\right]}\right)\psi_H(x_n)\cdots\psi_H(x_1)}{\int\mathcal{D}\psi\exp\left(i{\textstyle \int^T_{-T} d^4x\mathcal{L}\left[\psi\right]}\right)}

Schwinger-Dyson equations of motion:
\left\langle\left(\frac{\delta}{\delta\psi (x)}\int d^4x&#039;\mathcal{L}\right) T\left\{\psi (x_n)\cdots\psi (x_1)\right\}\right\rangle =\sum^n_{i=1}\left\langle\psi (x_n)\cdots\left(-i\delta^{(4)}(x-x_i)\right)\cdots\psi (x_1)\right\rangle

I'd put some Feynman rules and the Ward-Takahashi identity and stuff up but there's no Latex for Feynman diagrams.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
895
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
24K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
672
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K